Propose a change

Taxation (International and Other Provisions) Act 2010

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

100 First limitation for purposes of section 99(2)

(1) The first limitation for the purposes of section 99(2) is to treat the amount of the relevant income as reduced (but not below nil) for the purposes of this Chapter by the amount of expenses (if any) attributable to the relevant income. (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the amount of expenses attributable to the relevant income is the appropriate fraction of the total relevant expenses of the category of business concerned for the period of account in question. (3) In subsection (2) “the appropriate fraction” means the fraction given by— R I T I where— RI is the amount of the relevant income before any reduction in accordance with section 99(2), and TI is the total income of the category of business concerned for the period of account in question, but if that would result in TI being nil, TI is instead the amount described in subsection (4). (4) That amount is so much in total of the income and gains— (a) which arise to the company in the period of account in question, and (b) in respect of which credit for foreign tax is to be allowed under any double taxation arrangements or under unilateral relief arrangements for any territory outside the United Kingdom, as are referable to the category of business concerned (before any reduction in accordance with section 99(2)). (5) Subsection (4) is to be read with section 104 (determining how much of any income or gain is referable to a category of business). (6) In this section “the relevant income” has the meaning given by section 99(2).

Your change, as a redline

100 First limitation for purposes of section 99(2)

(1) The first limitation for the purposes of section 99(2) is to treat the amount of the relevant income as reduced (but not below nil) for the purposes of this Chapter by the amount of expenses (if any) attributable to the relevant income. (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the amount of expenses attributable to the relevant income is the appropriate fraction of the total relevant expenses of the category of business concerned for the period of account in question. (3) In subsection (2) “the appropriate fraction” means the fraction given by— R I T I where— RI is the amount of the relevant income before any reduction in accordance with section 99(2), and TI is the total income of the category of business concerned for the period of account in question, but if that would result in TI being nil, TI is instead the amount described in subsection (4). (4) That amount is so much in total of the income and gains— (a) which arise to the company in the period of account in question, and (b) in respect of which credit for foreign tax is to be allowed under any double taxation arrangements or under unilateral relief arrangements for any territory outside the United Kingdom, as are referable to the category of business concerned (before any reduction in accordance with section 99(2)). (5) Subsection (4) is to be read with section 104 (determining how much of any income or gain is referable to a category of business). (6) In this section “the relevant income” has the meaning given by section 99(2).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds