Propose a change

Taxation (International and Other Provisions) Act 2010

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

131 Interpreting provision about interest influenced by special relationship

(1) Subsections (3) and (6) apply if double taxation arrangements— (a) make provision, whether for relief or otherwise, in relation to interest (as defined in the arrangements), and (b) contain a special relationship rule. (2) A “special relationship rule” is provision that— (a) applies if the amount of the interest paid is, because of a special relationship, greater than the amount (“the ordinary amount”) that would have been paid in the absence of the relationship, and (b) has the effect that the provision mentioned in subsection (1)(a) is to apply only to the ordinary amount. (3) The special relationship rule is to be read as requiring account to be taken of all factors, including— (a) the question whether the loan would have been made at all in the absence of the special relationship, (b) the amount which the loan would have been in the absence of the special relationship, and (c) the rate of interest, and the other terms, which would have been agreed in the absence of the special relationship. (4) Subsection (3) does not apply if the special relationship rule expressly requires regard to be had to the debt on which interest is paid in determining the excess interest (and accordingly expressly limits the factors to be taken into account). (5) If— (a) a company (“L”) makes a loan to another company with which it has a special relationship, and (b) it is not part of L's business to make loans generally, the fact that it is not part of L's business to make loans generally is to be disregarded in applying subsection (3). (6) The special relationship rule is to be read as requiring the taxpayer— (a) to show that there is no special relationship, or (b) if there is a special relationship, to show the amount of interest that would have been paid in the absence of the relationship.

Your change, as a redline

131 Interpreting provision about interest influenced by special relationship

(1) Subsections (3) and (6) apply if double taxation arrangements— (a) make provision, whether for relief or otherwise, in relation to interest (as defined in the arrangements), and (b) contain a special relationship rule. (2) A “special relationship rule” is provision that— (a) applies if the amount of the interest paid is, because of a special relationship, greater than the amount (“the ordinary amount”) that would have been paid in the absence of the relationship, and (b) has the effect that the provision mentioned in subsection (1)(a) is to apply only to the ordinary amount. (3) The special relationship rule is to be read as requiring account to be taken of all factors, including— (a) the question whether the loan would have been made at all in the absence of the special relationship, (b) the amount which the loan would have been in the absence of the special relationship, and (c) the rate of interest, and the other terms, which would have been agreed in the absence of the special relationship. (4) Subsection (3) does not apply if the special relationship rule expressly requires regard to be had to the debt on which interest is paid in determining the excess interest (and accordingly expressly limits the factors to be taken into account). (5) If— (a) a company (“L”) makes a loan to another company with which it has a special relationship, and (b) it is not part of L's business to make loans generally, the fact that it is not part of L's business to make loans generally is to be disregarded in applying subsection (3). (6) The special relationship rule is to be read as requiring the taxpayer— (a) to show that there is no special relationship, or (b) if there is a special relationship, to show the amount of interest that would have been paid in the absence of the relationship.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds