Propose a change

Taxation (International and Other Provisions) Act 2010

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

259FB Counteraction of the excessive PE deduction

(1) For corporation tax purposes, the excessive PE deduction may not be deducted from the company's income for the relevant PE period unless it is deducted from dual inclusion income for that period. (2) So much of the excessive PE deduction (if any) as, by virtue of subsection (1), cannot be deducted from the company's income for the relevant PE period— (a) is carried forward to subsequent accounting periods of the company, and (b) for corporation tax purposes, may be deducted from dual inclusion income of the company for any such period (and not from any other income), so far as it cannot be deducted under this paragraph for an earlier period. (3) In this section “dual inclusion income” of the company for an accounting period means an amount that is both— (a) ordinary income of the company for that period for corporation tax purposes, and (b) ordinary income of the company for a permitted taxable period for the purposes of a tax charged under the law of the parent jurisdiction. (4) A taxable period of the company is “permitted” for the purposes of paragraph (b) of subsection (3) if— (a) the period begins before the end of 12 months after the end of the accounting period mentioned in paragraph (a) of that subsection, or (b) where the period begins after that— (i) a claim has been made for the period to be a permitted period in relation to the amount of ordinary income, and (ii) it is just and reasonable for the amount of ordinary income to arise for that taxable period rather than an earlier period. (5) For the purposes of subsection (3)(b) the reference to ordinary income of the company for a permitted taxable period for the purposes of a tax charged under the law of the parent jurisdiction is taken to include a reference to excessive PE inclusion income of the company. (6) Section 259FC defines “excessive PE inclusion income” of the company for this purpose.

Your change, as a redline

259FB Counteraction of the excessive PE deduction

(1) For corporation tax purposes, the excessive PE deduction may not be deducted from the company's income for the relevant PE period unless it is deducted from dual inclusion income for that period. (2) So much of the excessive PE deduction (if any) as, by virtue of subsection (1), cannot be deducted from the company's income for the relevant PE period— (a) is carried forward to subsequent accounting periods of the company, and (b) for corporation tax purposes, may be deducted from dual inclusion income of the company for any such period (and not from any other income), so far as it cannot be deducted under this paragraph for an earlier period. (3) In this section “dual inclusion income” of the company for an accounting period means an amount that is both— (a) ordinary income of the company for that period for corporation tax purposes, and (b) ordinary income of the company for a permitted taxable period for the purposes of a tax charged under the law of the parent jurisdiction. (4) A taxable period of the company is “permitted” for the purposes of paragraph (b) of subsection (3) if— (a) the period begins before the end of 12 months after the end of the accounting period mentioned in paragraph (a) of that subsection, or (b) where the period begins after that— (i) a claim has been made for the period to be a permitted period in relation to the amount of ordinary income, and (ii) it is just and reasonable for the amount of ordinary income to arise for that taxable period rather than an earlier period. (5) For the purposes of subsection (3)(b) the reference to ordinary income of the company for a permitted taxable period for the purposes of a tax charged under the law of the parent jurisdiction is taken to include a reference to excessive PE inclusion income of the company. (6) Section 259FC defines “excessive PE inclusion income” of the company for this purpose.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds