Propose a change

Taxation (International and Other Provisions) Act 2010

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

259GA Circumstances in which the Chapter applies

(1) This Chapter applies if conditions A to E are met. (2) Condition A is that a payment or quasi-payment is made under, or in connection with, an arrangement. (3) Condition B is that a payee is a hybrid entity (a “hybrid payee”). (4) Condition C is that— (a) the payer is within the charge to corporation tax for the payment period, (b) an investor in a hybrid payee is within the charge to corporation tax for an accounting period some or all of which falls within the payment period, or (c) a hybrid payee is a limited liability partnership. (5) Condition D is that it is reasonable to suppose that, disregarding the provisions mentioned in subsection (6), there would be a hybrid payee deduction/non-inclusion mismatch in relation to the payment or quasi-payment (see section 259GB). (6) The provisions are— (a) this Chapter and Chapters 8 to 10, and (b) any equivalent provision under the law of a territory outside the United Kingdom. (7) Condition E is that— (a) it is a quasi-payment that is made as mentioned in subsection (2) and the payer is also a hybrid payee (see section 259BB(7)), (b) the payer and a hybrid payee or an investor in a hybrid payee are in the same control group (see section 259NB) at any time in the period— (i) beginning with the day on which the arrangement mentioned in subsection (2) is made, and (ii) ending with the last day of the payment period, or (c) that arrangement is a structured arrangement. (8) The arrangement is “structured” if it is reasonable to suppose that— (a) the arrangement is designed to secure a hybrid payee deduction/non-inclusion mismatch, or (b) the terms of the arrangement share the economic benefit of the mismatch between the parties to the arrangement or otherwise reflect the fact that the mismatch is expected to arise. (9) The arrangement may be designed to secure a hybrid payee deduction/non-inclusion mismatch despite also being designed to secure any commercial or other objective. (10) The following provisions contain provision for the counteraction of the hybrid payee deduction/non-inclusion mismatch— (a) section 259GC (cases where the payer is within the charge to corporation tax for the payment period), (b) section 259GD (cases where an investor in a hybrid payee is within the charge to corporation tax), and (c) section 259GE (cases where a hybrid payee is a limited liability partnership).

Your change, as a redline

259GA Circumstances in which the Chapter applies

(1) This Chapter applies if conditions A to E are met. (2) Condition A is that a payment or quasi-payment is made under, or in connection with, an arrangement. (3) Condition B is that a payee is a hybrid entity (a “hybrid payee”). (4) Condition C is that— (a) the payer is within the charge to corporation tax for the payment period, (b) an investor in a hybrid payee is within the charge to corporation tax for an accounting period some or all of which falls within the payment period, or (c) a hybrid payee is a limited liability partnership. (5) Condition D is that it is reasonable to suppose that, disregarding the provisions mentioned in subsection (6), there would be a hybrid payee deduction/non-inclusion mismatch in relation to the payment or quasi-payment (see section 259GB). (6) The provisions are— (a) this Chapter and Chapters 8 to 10, and (b) any equivalent provision under the law of a territory outside the United Kingdom. (7) Condition E is that— (a) it is a quasi-payment that is made as mentioned in subsection (2) and the payer is also a hybrid payee (see section 259BB(7)), (b) the payer and a hybrid payee or an investor in a hybrid payee are in the same control group (see section 259NB) at any time in the period— (i) beginning with the day on which the arrangement mentioned in subsection (2) is made, and (ii) ending with the last day of the payment period, or (c) that arrangement is a structured arrangement. (8) The arrangement is “structured” if it is reasonable to suppose that— (a) the arrangement is designed to secure a hybrid payee deduction/non-inclusion mismatch, or (b) the terms of the arrangement share the economic benefit of the mismatch between the parties to the arrangement or otherwise reflect the fact that the mismatch is expected to arise. (9) The arrangement may be designed to secure a hybrid payee deduction/non-inclusion mismatch despite also being designed to secure any commercial or other objective. (10) The following provisions contain provision for the counteraction of the hybrid payee deduction/non-inclusion mismatch— (a) section 259GC (cases where the payer is within the charge to corporation tax for the payment period), (b) section 259GD (cases where an investor in a hybrid payee is within the charge to corporation tax), and (c) section 259GE (cases where a hybrid payee is a limited liability partnership).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds