Propose a change

Taxation (International and Other Provisions) Act 2010

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

259IA Circumstances in which the Chapter applies

(1) This Chapter applies if conditions A to C are met. (2) Condition A is that there is an amount or part of an amount that, disregarding the provisions mentioned in subsection (3), it is reasonable to suppose— (a) could be deducted from the income of a hybrid entity for the purposes of calculating the taxable profits of that entity for a taxable period (“the hybrid entity deduction period”), and (b) could also be deducted, under the law of the investor jurisdiction, from the income of an investor in the hybrid entity for the purposes of calculating the taxable profits of that investor for a taxable period (“the investor deduction period”). (3) The provisions are— (a) this Chapter and Chapter 10, and (b) any equivalent provision under the law of a territory outside the United Kingdom. (4) In this Chapter the amount or part of an amount mentioned in subsection (2) is referred to as “the hybrid entity double deduction amount”. (5) Condition B is that— (a) the investor is within the charge to corporation tax for the investor deduction period, or (b) the hybrid entity is within the charge to corporation tax for the hybrid entity deduction period. (6) Condition C is that— (a) the hybrid entity and any investor in it are related (see section 259NC) at any time— (i) in the hybrid entity deduction period, or (ii) in the investor deduction period, or (b) an arrangement, to which the hybrid entity or any investor in it is party, is a structured arrangement. (7) An arrangement is “structured” if it is reasonable to suppose that— (a) the arrangement is designed to secure the hybrid entity double deduction amount, or (b) the terms of the arrangement share the economic benefit of that amount being deductible by both the hybrid entity and the investor between the parties to the arrangement or otherwise reflect the fact that the amount is expected to arise. (8) The arrangement may be designed to secure the hybrid entity double deduction amount despite also being designed to secure any commercial or other objective. (9) Sections 259IB (cases where the investor is within the charge to corporation tax for the investor deduction period) and 259IC (cases where the hybrid entity is within the charge to corporation tax for the hybrid entity deduction period) contain provision for the counteraction of the hybrid entity double deduction amount.

Your change, as a redline

259IA Circumstances in which the Chapter applies

(1) This Chapter applies if conditions A to C are met. (2) Condition A is that there is an amount or part of an amount that, disregarding the provisions mentioned in subsection (3), it is reasonable to suppose— (a) could be deducted from the income of a hybrid entity for the purposes of calculating the taxable profits of that entity for a taxable period (“the hybrid entity deduction period”), and (b) could also be deducted, under the law of the investor jurisdiction, from the income of an investor in the hybrid entity for the purposes of calculating the taxable profits of that investor for a taxable period (“the investor deduction period”). (3) The provisions are— (a) this Chapter and Chapter 10, and (b) any equivalent provision under the law of a territory outside the United Kingdom. (4) In this Chapter the amount or part of an amount mentioned in subsection (2) is referred to as “the hybrid entity double deduction amount”. (5) Condition B is that— (a) the investor is within the charge to corporation tax for the investor deduction period, or (b) the hybrid entity is within the charge to corporation tax for the hybrid entity deduction period. (6) Condition C is that— (a) the hybrid entity and any investor in it are related (see section 259NC) at any time— (i) in the hybrid entity deduction period, or (ii) in the investor deduction period, or (b) an arrangement, to which the hybrid entity or any investor in it is party, is a structured arrangement. (7) An arrangement is “structured” if it is reasonable to suppose that— (a) the arrangement is designed to secure the hybrid entity double deduction amount, or (b) the terms of the arrangement share the economic benefit of that amount being deductible by both the hybrid entity and the investor between the parties to the arrangement or otherwise reflect the fact that the amount is expected to arise. (8) The arrangement may be designed to secure the hybrid entity double deduction amount despite also being designed to secure any commercial or other objective. (9) Sections 259IB (cases where the investor is within the charge to corporation tax for the investor deduction period) and 259IC (cases where the hybrid entity is within the charge to corporation tax for the hybrid entity deduction period) contain provision for the counteraction of the hybrid entity double deduction amount.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds