Propose a change

Taxation (International and Other Provisions) Act 2010

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

371DE Exclusion: independent companies' arrangements

(1) Subsection (2) applies if— (a) an asset or risk is included in the relevant assets and risks, (b) the SPFs which are relevant to the economic ownership of the asset, or the assumption and management of the risk, are wholly or partly UK SPFs as determined at step 4 in section 371DB(1), (c) as a result of that determination, an amount is included in the provisional Chapter 4 profits, and (d) the UK SPFs are carried out by companies connected with the CFC under arrangements made between the CFC and those companies. (2) The amount is to be excluded from the provisional Chapter 4 profits if it is reasonable to suppose that, were the SPFs which are UK SPFs not to be carried out by companies connected with the CFC, the CFC would enter into arrangements with companies not connected with the CFC which— (a) would be structured in the same way as the arrangements mentioned in subsection (1)(d), and (b) would, in relation to the CFC's business, have the same commercial effect as those arrangements. (3) Subsection (4) applies if— (a) there are SPFs which are relevant to the economic ownership of a number of assets, or the assumption and management of a number of risks, included in the relevant assets and risks, and (b) it is not reasonably practicable to separate those assets or risks for the purpose of determining the extent to which the SPFs are relevant to the economic ownership of each of those assets, or the assumption and management of each of those risks, separately. (4) In subsection (1) references to an asset or risk are to be read as references to those assets or risks taken together.

Your change, as a redline

371DE Exclusion: independent companies' arrangements

(1) Subsection (2) applies if— (a) an asset or risk is included in the relevant assets and risks, (b) the SPFs which are relevant to the economic ownership of the asset, or the assumption and management of the risk, are wholly or partly UK SPFs as determined at step 4 in section 371DB(1), (c) as a result of that determination, an amount is included in the provisional Chapter 4 profits, and (d) the UK SPFs are carried out by companies connected with the CFC under arrangements made between the CFC and those companies. (2) The amount is to be excluded from the provisional Chapter 4 profits if it is reasonable to suppose that, were the SPFs which are UK SPFs not to be carried out by companies connected with the CFC, the CFC would enter into arrangements with companies not connected with the CFC which— (a) would be structured in the same way as the arrangements mentioned in subsection (1)(d), and (b) would, in relation to the CFC's business, have the same commercial effect as those arrangements. (3) Subsection (4) applies if— (a) there are SPFs which are relevant to the economic ownership of a number of assets, or the assumption and management of a number of risks, included in the relevant assets and risks, and (b) it is not reasonably practicable to separate those assets or risks for the purpose of determining the extent to which the SPFs are relevant to the economic ownership of each of those assets, or the assumption and management of each of those risks, separately. (4) In subsection (1) references to an asset or risk are to be read as references to those assets or risks taken together.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds