Propose a change

Taxation (International and Other Provisions) Act 2010

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

371IF Determining the profits of a qualifying loan relationship

Take the following steps to determine the profits of a qualifying loan relationship for the purposes of this Chapter. Step 1 Determine the credits from the qualifying loan relationship which are brought into account in determining the CFC's non-trading finance profits. The result is “the step 1 credits”. Step 2 Determine the credits and debits which are brought into account in determining the CFC's non-trading finance profits so far as they— are from any derivative contract or other arrangement (other than a qualifying loan relationship) entered into by the CFC as a hedge of risk in connection with the qualifying loan relationship, and are attributable to the hedge of risk. If the credits exceed the debits add the excess to the step 1 credits and if the debits exceed the credits subtract the deficit from the step 1 credits. The result is “the step 2 credits”. Step 3 Allocate to the qualifying loan relationship a just and reasonable proportion of the credits from the CFC's relevant debtor relationships which are brought into account in determining the CFC's non-trading finance profits (so far as not reflected in the step 2 credits). Add the credits to the step 2 credits. The result is “the step 3 credits”. A debtor relationship of the CFC is “relevant” if the loan which is the subject of it is used by the CFC to fund the loan which is the subject of the qualifying loan relationship Step 4 Allocate to the qualifying loan relationship a just and reasonable proportion of the credits and debits which are brought into account in determining the CFC's non-trading finance profits so far as they— are from any derivative contract or other arrangement (other than a qualifying loan relationship or a relevant debtor relationship) entered into by the CFC as a hedge of risk in connection with a relevant debtor relationship, and are attributable to the hedge of risk. If the credits exceed the debits add the excess to the step 3 credits and if the debits exceed the credits subtract the deficit from the step 3 credits. The result is “the step 4 credits”. Step 5 Allocate to the qualifying loan relationship a just and reasonable proportion of— the debits from the CFC's loan relationships which are brought into account in determining the CFC's non-trading finance profits (so far as not reflected in the step 4 credits), and any amounts set off under Chapter 16 or Chapter 16A of Part 5 of CTA 2009 (non-trading deficits) against amounts which, apart from the set off, would be included in the CFC's non-trading finance profits. Reduce the step 4 credits accordingly to give the profits of the qualifying loan relationship.

Your change, as a redline

371IF Determining the profits of a qualifying loan relationship

Take the following steps to determine the profits of a qualifying loan relationship for the purposes of this Chapter. Step 1 Determine the credits from the qualifying loan relationship which are brought into account in determining the CFC's non-trading finance profits. The result is “the step 1 credits”. Step 2 Determine the credits and debits which are brought into account in determining the CFC's non-trading finance profits so far as they— are from any derivative contract or other arrangement (other than a qualifying loan relationship) entered into by the CFC as a hedge of risk in connection with the qualifying loan relationship, and are attributable to the hedge of risk. If the credits exceed the debits add the excess to the step 1 credits and if the debits exceed the credits subtract the deficit from the step 1 credits. The result is “the step 2 credits”. Step 3 Allocate to the qualifying loan relationship a just and reasonable proportion of the credits from the CFC's relevant debtor relationships which are brought into account in determining the CFC's non-trading finance profits (so far as not reflected in the step 2 credits). Add the credits to the step 2 credits. The result is “the step 3 credits”. A debtor relationship of the CFC is “relevant” if the loan which is the subject of it is used by the CFC to fund the loan which is the subject of the qualifying loan relationship Step 4 Allocate to the qualifying loan relationship a just and reasonable proportion of the credits and debits which are brought into account in determining the CFC's non-trading finance profits so far as they— are from any derivative contract or other arrangement (other than a qualifying loan relationship or a relevant debtor relationship) entered into by the CFC as a hedge of risk in connection with a relevant debtor relationship, and are attributable to the hedge of risk. If the credits exceed the debits add the excess to the step 3 credits and if the debits exceed the credits subtract the deficit from the step 3 credits. The result is “the step 4 credits”. Step 5 Allocate to the qualifying loan relationship a just and reasonable proportion of— the debits from the CFC's loan relationships which are brought into account in determining the CFC's non-trading finance profits (so far as not reflected in the step 4 credits), and any amounts set off under Chapter 16 or Chapter 16A of Part 5 of CTA 2009 (non-trading deficits) against amounts which, apart from the set off, would be included in the CFC's non-trading finance profits. Reduce the step 4 credits accordingly to give the profits of the qualifying loan relationship.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds