Propose a change

Taxation (International and Other Provisions) Act 2010

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

371RB Legal and economic control

(1) A person (“P”) “controls” a company (“C”) if— (a) by means of the holding of shares or the possession of voting power in or in relation to C or any other company, or (b) by virtue of any powers conferred by the articles of association or other document regulating C or any other company, P has the power to secure that the affairs of C are conducted in accordance with P's wishes. (2) A person (“P”) “controls” a company (“C”) if it is reasonable to suppose that P would— (a) if the whole of C's share capital were disposed of, receive (directly or indirectly and whether at the time of the disposal or later) over 50% of the proceeds of the disposal, (b) if the whole of C's income were distributed, receive (directly or indirectly and whether at the time of the distribution or later) over 50% of the distributed amount, or (c) in the event of the winding-up of C or in any other circumstances, receive (directly or indirectly and whether at the time of the winding-up or other circumstances or later) over 50% of C's assets which would then be available for distribution. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2) any rights which P has as a relevant bank are to be ignored. (4) In subsection (2)— (a) in paragraph (a) the reference to C's share capital is to C's share capital excluding any share capital held by relevant banks, (b) in determining for the purposes of paragraph (b) the percentage of the distributed amount which it is reasonable to suppose P would receive, ignore any rights of a relevant bank which would entitle the bank directly to receive a percentage of the distributed amount at the time of the distribution, and (c) in determining for the purposes of paragraph (c) the percentage of C's assets which it is reasonable to suppose P would receive, ignore any rights of a relevant bank which would entitle the bank directly to receive a percentage of C's assets at the time of the winding-up or other circumstances. (5) “Relevant bank” means a person (“RB”) who— (a) carries on banking business which is regulated in the territory in which RB is resident, and (b) is acting, in the ordinary course of that business, in relation to money lent to C by RB in the ordinary course of that business. (6) In subsections (2) and (4) references to P receiving any proceeds, amount or assets include references to the proceeds, amount or assets being applied (directly or indirectly) for P's benefit. (7) If two or more persons, taken together, meet the requirement of subsection (1) or (2) for controlling a company, those persons are taken to control the company.

Your change, as a redline

371RB Legal and economic control

(1) A person (“P”) “controls” a company (“C”) if— (a) by means of the holding of shares or the possession of voting power in or in relation to C or any other company, or (b) by virtue of any powers conferred by the articles of association or other document regulating C or any other company, P has the power to secure that the affairs of C are conducted in accordance with P's wishes. (2) A person (“P”) “controls” a company (“C”) if it is reasonable to suppose that P would— (a) if the whole of C's share capital were disposed of, receive (directly or indirectly and whether at the time of the disposal or later) over 50% of the proceeds of the disposal, (b) if the whole of C's income were distributed, receive (directly or indirectly and whether at the time of the distribution or later) over 50% of the distributed amount, or (c) in the event of the winding-up of C or in any other circumstances, receive (directly or indirectly and whether at the time of the winding-up or other circumstances or later) over 50% of C's assets which would then be available for distribution. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2) any rights which P has as a relevant bank are to be ignored. (4) In subsection (2)— (a) in paragraph (a) the reference to C's share capital is to C's share capital excluding any share capital held by relevant banks, (b) in determining for the purposes of paragraph (b) the percentage of the distributed amount which it is reasonable to suppose P would receive, ignore any rights of a relevant bank which would entitle the bank directly to receive a percentage of the distributed amount at the time of the distribution, and (c) in determining for the purposes of paragraph (c) the percentage of C's assets which it is reasonable to suppose P would receive, ignore any rights of a relevant bank which would entitle the bank directly to receive a percentage of C's assets at the time of the winding-up or other circumstances. (5) “Relevant bank” means a person (“RB”) who— (a) carries on banking business which is regulated in the territory in which RB is resident, and (b) is acting, in the ordinary course of that business, in relation to money lent to C by RB in the ordinary course of that business. (6) In subsections (2) and (4) references to P receiving any proceeds, amount or assets include references to the proceeds, amount or assets being applied (directly or indirectly) for P's benefit. (7) If two or more persons, taken together, meet the requirement of subsection (1) or (2) for controlling a company, those persons are taken to control the company.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds