Propose a change

Taxation (International and Other Provisions) Act 2010

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

45 Credit against tax on trade income: anti-avoidance rules

(1) If a company (“A”) carrying on a trade giving rise to trade income enters into a scheme or arrangement with another person (“B”) a main purpose of which is to alter the effect of section 44(2) and (3) in relation to A, income received in pursuance of the scheme or arrangement is to be treated for the purposes of section 44(2) and (3) as trade income of B (and not as income of A). (2) Income of a person (“D”) is to be treated for the purposes of section 44 as trade income (if it is not otherwise trade income) of D if— (a) the income is received by D as part of a scheme or arrangement entered into by D and a connected person (“C”), (b) had C received the income, it would be reasonable to assume that it would be trade income of C, and (c) a main purpose of the scheme or arrangement is to produce the result that section 44(2) and (3) will not have effect in relation to the income because it is received by D. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) it is to be assumed that, in the case of any relevant transaction to which a relevant person is a party, C were that party to the transaction. (4) In subsection (3)— “relevant person” means— D, or any other connected person who is a party to the scheme or arrangement mentioned in subsection (2), and “relevant transaction” means any of the transactions giving rise to the income mentioned in subsection (2)(b). (5) In subsections (2) to (4) “connected person” means a person with whom D is connected. (6) Section 1122 of CTA 2010 (meaning of “connected”) applies for the purposes of subsection (5). (7) In this section “trade income” has the same meaning as in section 44.

Your change, as a redline

45 Credit against tax on trade income: anti-avoidance rules

(1) If a company (“A”) carrying on a trade giving rise to trade income enters into a scheme or arrangement with another person (“B”) a main purpose of which is to alter the effect of section 44(2) and (3) in relation to A, income received in pursuance of the scheme or arrangement is to be treated for the purposes of section 44(2) and (3) as trade income of B (and not as income of A). (2) Income of a person (“D”) is to be treated for the purposes of section 44 as trade income (if it is not otherwise trade income) of D if— (a) the income is received by D as part of a scheme or arrangement entered into by D and a connected person (“C”), (b) had C received the income, it would be reasonable to assume that it would be trade income of C, and (c) a main purpose of the scheme or arrangement is to produce the result that section 44(2) and (3) will not have effect in relation to the income because it is received by D. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) it is to be assumed that, in the case of any relevant transaction to which a relevant person is a party, C were that party to the transaction. (4) In subsection (3)— “relevant person” means— D, or any other connected person who is a party to the scheme or arrangement mentioned in subsection (2), and “relevant transaction” means any of the transactions giving rise to the income mentioned in subsection (2)(b). (5) In subsections (2) to (4) “connected person” means a person with whom D is connected. (6) Section 1122 of CTA 2010 (meaning of “connected”) applies for the purposes of subsection (5). (7) In this section “trade income” has the same meaning as in section 44.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds