Propose a change

Taxation (International and Other Provisions) Act 2010

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

49 Restricting section 44(3) if company is a bank or connected with a bank

(1) Section 44(3) is subject to subsection (2) of this section if— (a) the company is a bank or is connected with a bank, and (b) the amount of the included funding costs is significantly less than the amount of the notional funding costs. (2) The amount of the notional funding costs is to be included in the amount to be taken into account under section 44(3), but only so far as it exceeds the amount of the included funding costs. (3) In this section— “the company” means the company mentioned in section 44(3)(a), “included funding costs” means the total of the funding costs that are— incurred by the company, or any company connected with the company, in respect of capital used to fund the relevant transaction, and included in the amount to be taken into account under section 44(3) before the application of subsection (2) of this section, “notional funding costs” means the funding costs that the relevant bank would incur (on the basis of its average funding costs) in respect of the capital that would be needed to wholly fund the relevant transaction if that transaction were funded in that way, “the relevant bank” means the bank that is the company, or with which the company is connected, and “the relevant transaction” means the transaction, arrangement or asset from which the income mentioned in section 44(1) arises. (4) The following provisions apply for the purposes of this section— section 1120 of CTA 2010 (meaning of “bank”), and section 1122 of CTA 2010 (meaning of “connected”).

Your change, as a redline

49 Restricting section 44(3) if company is a bank or connected with a bank

(1) Section 44(3) is subject to subsection (2) of this section if— (a) the company is a bank or is connected with a bank, and (b) the amount of the included funding costs is significantly less than the amount of the notional funding costs. (2) The amount of the notional funding costs is to be included in the amount to be taken into account under section 44(3), but only so far as it exceeds the amount of the included funding costs. (3) In this section— “the company” means the company mentioned in section 44(3)(a), “included funding costs” means the total of the funding costs that are— incurred by the company, or any company connected with the company, in respect of capital used to fund the relevant transaction, and included in the amount to be taken into account under section 44(3) before the application of subsection (2) of this section, “notional funding costs” means the funding costs that the relevant bank would incur (on the basis of its average funding costs) in respect of the capital that would be needed to wholly fund the relevant transaction if that transaction were funded in that way, “the relevant bank” means the bank that is the company, or with which the company is connected, and “the relevant transaction” means the transaction, arrangement or asset from which the income mentioned in section 44(1) arises. (4) The following provisions apply for the purposes of this section— section 1120 of CTA 2010 (meaning of “bank”), and section 1122 of CTA 2010 (meaning of “connected”).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds