Propose a change

Taxation (International and Other Provisions) Act 2010

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

68 Meaning of “avoidance scheme” in section 67

(1) In section 67 “avoidance scheme” means any scheme or arrangement in respect of which each of conditions A to C is met. (2) Condition A is that the purpose, or one of the main purposes, of the scheme or arrangement is to have an amount of underlying tax taken into account on a claim for an allowance by way of credit in accordance with this Part. (3) Condition B is that the parties to the scheme or arrangement include— (a) the company which is the claimant company for the purposes of section 67, (b) a company related to the claimant company, or (c) a person connected with the claimant company. (4) Condition C is that the parties to the scheme or arrangement include a person who was not under the control of the claimant company at any time before the doing of anything as part of, or in pursuance of, the scheme or arrangement. (5) For the purposes of subsection (3)(b), a company (“R”) is related to the claimant company if the claimant company— (a) controls directly or indirectly, or (b) is a subsidiary of a company which controls directly or indirectly, at least 10% of the voting power in R. (6) For the purposes of subsection (3)(c), whether a person is connected with another is determined in accordance with section 1122 of CTA 2010. (7) For the purposes of subsection (4), a person who is a party to a scheme or arrangement is to be taken to have been under the control of the claimant company at all the following times— (a) any time when the claimant company would have been taken (in accordance with sections 450 and 451 of CTA 2010) to have had control of the person for the purposes of Part 10 of CTA 2010 (close companies), (b) any time when the claimant company would have been so taken if sections 450 and 451 of CTA 2010 applied (with the necessary modifications) in the case of partnerships and unincorporated associations as they apply in the case of companies, and (c) any time when the person acted in relation to the scheme or arrangement, or any proposal for it, either directly or indirectly under the direction of the claimant company. (8) For the purposes of subsection (5), the claimant company is a subsidiary of another company (“P”) if P controls, directly or indirectly, at least 50% of the voting power in the claimant company. (9) In this section “arrangement” means an arrangement of any kind, whether in writing or not.

Your change, as a redline

68 Meaning of “avoidance scheme” in section 67

(1) In section 67 “avoidance scheme” means any scheme or arrangement in respect of which each of conditions A to C is met. (2) Condition A is that the purpose, or one of the main purposes, of the scheme or arrangement is to have an amount of underlying tax taken into account on a claim for an allowance by way of credit in accordance with this Part. (3) Condition B is that the parties to the scheme or arrangement include— (a) the company which is the claimant company for the purposes of section 67, (b) a company related to the claimant company, or (c) a person connected with the claimant company. (4) Condition C is that the parties to the scheme or arrangement include a person who was not under the control of the claimant company at any time before the doing of anything as part of, or in pursuance of, the scheme or arrangement. (5) For the purposes of subsection (3)(b), a company (“R”) is related to the claimant company if the claimant company— (a) controls directly or indirectly, or (b) is a subsidiary of a company which controls directly or indirectly, at least 10% of the voting power in R. (6) For the purposes of subsection (3)(c), whether a person is connected with another is determined in accordance with section 1122 of CTA 2010. (7) For the purposes of subsection (4), a person who is a party to a scheme or arrangement is to be taken to have been under the control of the claimant company at all the following times— (a) any time when the claimant company would have been taken (in accordance with sections 450 and 451 of CTA 2010) to have had control of the person for the purposes of Part 10 of CTA 2010 (close companies), (b) any time when the claimant company would have been so taken if sections 450 and 451 of CTA 2010 applied (with the necessary modifications) in the case of partnerships and unincorporated associations as they apply in the case of companies, and (c) any time when the person acted in relation to the scheme or arrangement, or any proposal for it, either directly or indirectly under the direction of the claimant company. (8) For the purposes of subsection (5), the claimant company is a subsidiary of another company (“P”) if P controls, directly or indirectly, at least 50% of the voting power in the claimant company. (9) In this section “arrangement” means an arrangement of any kind, whether in writing or not.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds