The Armed Forces Pensions (Remediable Service) (Amendment) Regulations 2025
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
6 Amendment of the Reserve Forces (Full-Time Reserve Service Pension Scheme 1997) Regulations 2010
(1) The Reserve Forces (Full-Time Reserve Service Pension Scheme 1997) Regulations 2010 are amended as follows. (2) In Schedule 1 (the Full-Time Reserve Forces Pension Scheme 1997), rule A.1 (interpretation: general), paragraph (2), omit the definition of “AFRS 2020”. (3) In Schedule 3 (remediable service), paragraph 1 (interpretation), for the definition of “legacy scheme” substitute— “legacy scheme”, in relation to a remedy member’s remediable service, means the FTRS 1997 and “legacy scheme benefits” means FTRS 1997 benefits; .
6 Amendment of the Reserve Forces (Full-Time Reserve Service Pension Scheme 1997) Regulations 2010
(1) The Reserve Forces (Full-Time Reserve Service Pension Scheme 1997) Regulations 2010 are amended as follows. (2) In Schedule 1 (the Full-Time Reserve Forces Pension Scheme 1997), rule A.1 (interpretation: general), paragraph (2), omit the definition of “AFRS 2020”. (3) In Schedule 3 (remediable service), paragraph 1 (interpretation), for the definition of “legacy scheme” substitute— “legacy scheme”, in relation to a remedy member’s remediable service, means the FTRS 1997 and “legacy scheme benefits” means FTRS 1997 benefits; .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.