The Co-ownership Contractual Schemes (Tax) Regulations 2025
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
8 Non-close condition
(1) A co-ownership scheme meets the non-close condition at any time that were it a company— (a) it would not be a close company in accordance with the rules in Chapter 2 of Part 10 of CTA 2010, or (b) it would be a close company, but only because it has a qualifying investor as a direct participator or indirect participator. (2) For the purposes of considering whether a co-ownership scheme meets the non-close condition under paragraph (1), the rules in Chapter 2 of Part 10 of CTA 2010 are to be applied as if— (a) the scheme were a company, (b) the rights of the participants in the scheme were shares in the company, and (c) the modifications to the rules set out in paragraphs (a) to (e) of paragraph 46(2) of Schedule 5AAA to TCGA 1992 applied, but as if the reference in paragraph (e) to the greater part of the voting power were a reference to 50% or more of the voting power. (3) In paragraph (1)(b), the following terms have the meaning given by paragraph 46 of Schedule 5AAA to TCGA 1992— (a) “direct participator”; (b) “indirect participator”; (c) “qualifying investor”.
8 Non-close condition
(1) A co-ownership scheme meets the non-close condition at any time that were it a company— (a) it would not be a close company in accordance with the rules in Chapter 2 of Part 10 of CTA 2010, or (b) it would be a close company, but only because it has a qualifying investor as a direct participator or indirect participator. (2) For the purposes of considering whether a co-ownership scheme meets the non-close condition under paragraph (1), the rules in Chapter 2 of Part 10 of CTA 2010 are to be applied as if— (a) the scheme were a company, (b) the rights of the participants in the scheme were shares in the company, and (c) the modifications to the rules set out in paragraphs (a) to (e) of paragraph 46(2) of Schedule 5AAA to TCGA 1992 applied, but as if the reference in paragraph (e) to the greater part of the voting power were a reference to 50% or more of the voting power. (3) In paragraph (1)(b), the following terms have the meaning given by paragraph 46 of Schedule 5AAA to TCGA 1992— (a) “direct participator”; (b) “indirect participator”; (c) “qualifying investor”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.