The Police (Conduct, Performance and Complaints and Misconduct) (Amendment) Regulations 2025
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
15 Amendments to regulation 42 (outcome of misconduct proceedings)
(1) Regulation 42 is amended as follows. (2) For paragraph (1) substitute— (1) Subject to the provisions of this regulation, where the person or persons conducting the misconduct proceedings find that the conduct of the officer concerned amounts to misconduct or gross misconduct, they must impose disciplinary action mentioned in paragraph (2) or (3) as appropriate. (1A) Subject to the provisions of this regulation, where the person or persons conducting the misconduct proceedings find that the conduct of the officer concerned amounts to neither misconduct nor gross misconduct, they must— (a) direct that the matter is referred to be dealt with under the reflective practice review process, or (b) take no further action. . (3) In paragraph (3)— (a) in sub-paragraph (a)— (i) for “person conducting or chairing” substitute “person or persons conducting”; (ii) for “decides” substitute “decide”; (b) in sub-paragraph (b)— (i) for “person conducting or chairing” substitute “person or persons conducting”; (ii) for “decides” substitute “decide”; (iii) for paragraphs (i) to (iii) substitute— (i) dismissal without notice, or (ii) if the person or persons conducting the misconduct proceedings are satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances which justify it— (aa) a final written warning, or (bb) reduction in rank. .
15 Amendments to regulation 42 (outcome of misconduct proceedings)
(1) Regulation 42 is amended as follows. (2) For paragraph (1) substitute— (1) Subject to the provisions of this regulation, where the person or persons conducting the misconduct proceedings find that the conduct of the officer concerned amounts to misconduct or gross misconduct, they must impose disciplinary action mentioned in paragraph (2) or (3) as appropriate. (1A) Subject to the provisions of this regulation, where the person or persons conducting the misconduct proceedings find that the conduct of the officer concerned amounts to neither misconduct nor gross misconduct, they must— (a) direct that the matter is referred to be dealt with under the reflective practice review process, or (b) take no further action. . (3) In paragraph (3)— (a) in sub-paragraph (a)— (i) for “person conducting or chairing” substitute “person or persons conducting”; (ii) for “decides” substitute “decide”; (b) in sub-paragraph (b)— (i) for “person conducting or chairing” substitute “person or persons conducting”; (ii) for “decides” substitute “decide”; (iii) for paragraphs (i) to (iii) substitute— (i) dismissal without notice, or (ii) if the person or persons conducting the misconduct proceedings are satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances which justify it— (aa) a final written warning, or (bb) reduction in rank. .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.