The Police (Conduct, Performance and Complaints and Misconduct) (Amendment) Regulations 2025
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
26 Amendments to regulation 12 (meeting following investigation under Schedule 3 to the 2002 Act)
(1) Regulation 12 is amended as follows.
(2) In paragraph (1), in the opening words, omit “, (3)”.
(3) In paragraph (2)(b), after “regulation 18(4) or 46(7)(d),” insert “or, where the period of the written improvement notice has been extended under regulation 46(3)(d), within the meaning of regulation 46(8)(c),”.
(4) Omit paragraph (3).
(5) In paragraph (6)—
(a) at the end of sub-paragraph (a) insert “and”;
(b) omit sub-paragraph (b) and the “and” after it;
(c) in sub-paragraph (c), for “third stage meeting” substitute “second stage meeting”.
(6) In paragraph (7), in the opening words, omit “, 23(2)”.
(7) In paragraph (8)—
(a) in the opening words—
(i) for “third stage meeting” substitute “second stage meeting”;
(ii) for “paragraph (3)” substitute “paragraph (2)”;
(iii) for “final written improvement notice” substitute “written improvement notice”;
(b) in sub-paragraph (a), for “third stage meeting” substitute “second stage meeting”.
Your change, as a redline
26 Amendments to regulation 12 (meeting following investigation under Schedule 3 to the 2002 Act)
(1) Regulation 12 is amended as follows.
(2) In paragraph (1), in the opening words, omit “, (3)”.
(3) In paragraph (2)(b), after “regulation 18(4) or 46(7)(d),” insert “or, where the period of the written improvement notice has been extended under regulation 46(3)(d), within the meaning of regulation 46(8)(c),”.
(4) Omit paragraph (3).
(5) In paragraph (6)—
(a) at the end of sub-paragraph (a) insert “and”;
(b) omit sub-paragraph (b) and the “and” after it;
(c) in sub-paragraph (c), for “third stage meeting” substitute “second stage meeting”.
(6) In paragraph (7), in the opening words, omit “, 23(2)”.
(7) In paragraph (8)—
(a) in the opening words—
(i) for “third stage meeting” substitute “second stage meeting”;
(ii) for “paragraph (3)” substitute “paragraph (2)”;
(iii) for “final written improvement notice” substitute “written improvement notice”;
(b) in sub-paragraph (a), for “third stage meeting” substitute “second stage meeting”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.