The Police (Conduct, Performance and Complaints and Misconduct) (Amendment) Regulations 2025
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
28 Amendments to regulation 14 (meeting following referral under the Conduct Regulations)
(1) Regulation 14 is amended as follows. (2) In the heading, after “Regulations” insert “or the Vetting Regulations”. (3) Before paragraph (1) insert— (A1) This regulation applies where regulation 32 does not apply and— (a) the appropriate authority assesses under regulation 14(2)(b), 23(5)(b) or 27(2)(a)(iii) of the Conduct Regulations that a matter should be referred to be dealt with under these Regulations, or (b) the vetting authority assesses under regulation 15(2)(a), 22(5)(a) or 24(1)(b) of the Vetting Regulations that a matter should be referred to be dealt with under these Regulations. . (4) In paragraph (1)— (a) for the opening words substitute “Where this regulation applies—”; (b) in sub-paragraph (a), omit “, (3)”; (c) in sub-paragraph (b)(i)— (i) for “each of paragraphs (2)(a) and (3)(a)” substitute “paragraph (2)(a)”; (ii) for “(1)(c) or (d)” substitute “(1)(b)(iii), (iv) or (v)”; (iii) for “14(1)” substitute “14(A1)”; (d) in sub-paragraph (b)(ii), for “14(2)(a)” substitute “14(1)(a)”; (e) in sub-paragraph (b)(iv)— (i) for “(c)” substitute “(e)”; (ii) after “Conduct Regulations” insert “or the assessor’s report submitted under regulation 23 of the Vetting Regulations”. (5) For paragraph (2) substitute— (2) In this regulation— (a) “investigator” is to be construed in accordance with the definition of that word in regulation 2(1) of the Conduct Regulations, and (b) “assessor” and “vetting authority” are to be construed in accordance with the definitions of those words in regulation 2(1) of the Vetting Regulations. .
28 Amendments to regulation 14 (meeting following referral under the Conduct Regulations)
(1) Regulation 14 is amended as follows. (2) In the heading, after “Regulations” insert “or the Vetting Regulations”. (3) Before paragraph (1) insert— (A1) This regulation applies where regulation 32 does not apply and— (a) the appropriate authority assesses under regulation 14(2)(b), 23(5)(b) or 27(2)(a)(iii) of the Conduct Regulations that a matter should be referred to be dealt with under these Regulations, or (b) the vetting authority assesses under regulation 15(2)(a), 22(5)(a) or 24(1)(b) of the Vetting Regulations that a matter should be referred to be dealt with under these Regulations. . (4) In paragraph (1)— (a) for the opening words substitute “Where this regulation applies—”; (b) in sub-paragraph (a), omit “, (3)”; (c) in sub-paragraph (b)(i)— (i) for “each of paragraphs (2)(a) and (3)(a)” substitute “paragraph (2)(a)”; (ii) for “(1)(c) or (d)” substitute “(1)(b)(iii), (iv) or (v)”; (iii) for “14(1)” substitute “14(A1)”; (d) in sub-paragraph (b)(ii), for “14(2)(a)” substitute “14(1)(a)”; (e) in sub-paragraph (b)(iv)— (i) for “(c)” substitute “(e)”; (ii) after “Conduct Regulations” insert “or the assessor’s report submitted under regulation 23 of the Vetting Regulations”. (5) For paragraph (2) substitute— (2) In this regulation— (a) “investigator” is to be construed in accordance with the definition of that word in regulation 2(1) of the Conduct Regulations, and (b) “assessor” and “vetting authority” are to be construed in accordance with the definitions of those words in regulation 2(1) of the Vetting Regulations. .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.