The Police (Conduct, Performance and Complaints and Misconduct) (Amendment) Regulations 2025
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
52 Amendments to regulation 46 (outcomes)
(1) Regulation 46 is amended as follows.
(2) In paragraph (3), in each of sub-paragraphs (d) and (e), for “final written improvement notice” substitute “written improvement notice”.
(3) In paragraph (4)(b), for “third stage meeting” substitute “second stage meeting”.
(4) In paragraph (7)—
(a) in the opening words, omit “or a final written improvement notice”;
(b) for sub-paragraph (c) substitute—
(c) state that, if a sufficient improvement is not made within such period as the panel specifies in accordance with paragraph (7A), the officer may be required to attend another second stage meeting, and state the date with which this period ends;
;
(c) in sub-paragraph (e)—
(i) after “may be required to attend”, for “a” substitute “another”;
(ii) omit “(in the case of a written improvement notice) or another third stage meeting (in the case of a final written improvement notice”.
(5) After paragraph (7) insert—
(7A) The period specified must be three months, except where the panel considers that there are circumstances which justify a longer period, in which case the period specified must be a reasonable period not exceeding 12 months.
.
(6) In paragraph (8)—
(a) in the opening words, for “the final written improvement notice” substitute “a written improvement notice”;
(b) in sub-paragraph (a)(i), for “third stage meeting” substitute “second stage meeting”.
Your change, as a redline
52 Amendments to regulation 46 (outcomes)
(1) Regulation 46 is amended as follows.
(2) In paragraph (3), in each of sub-paragraphs (d) and (e), for “final written improvement notice” substitute “written improvement notice”.
(3) In paragraph (4)(b), for “third stage meeting” substitute “second stage meeting”.
(4) In paragraph (7)—
(a) in the opening words, omit “or a final written improvement notice”;
(b) for sub-paragraph (c) substitute—
(c) state that, if a sufficient improvement is not made within such period as the panel specifies in accordance with paragraph (7A), the officer may be required to attend another second stage meeting, and state the date with which this period ends;
;
(c) in sub-paragraph (e)—
(i) after “may be required to attend”, for “a” substitute “another”;
(ii) omit “(in the case of a written improvement notice) or another third stage meeting (in the case of a final written improvement notice”.
(5) After paragraph (7) insert—
(7A) The period specified must be three months, except where the panel considers that there are circumstances which justify a longer period, in which case the period specified must be a reasonable period not exceeding 12 months.
.
(6) In paragraph (8)—
(a) in the opening words, for “the final written improvement notice” substitute “a written improvement notice”;
(b) in sub-paragraph (a)(i), for “third stage meeting” substitute “second stage meeting”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.