The Special Educational Needs (Consequential Amendments to Subordinate Legislation) Order 2014
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
23 Amendment to the Education (Information About Children in Alternative Provision) (England) Regulations 2007
In regulation 2(1) of the Education (Information About Children in Alternative Provision) (England) Regulations 2007 (interpretation) in the definition of “special education needs provision type” for the words “pursuant to” to the end substitute ““The Special Educational Needs and Disability Code of Practice: 0-25 years” published on 29th July 2014 under section 77 of the Children and Families Act 2014”.
23 Amendment to the Education (Information About Children in Alternative Provision) (England) Regulations 2007
In regulation 2(1) of the Education (Information About Children in Alternative Provision) (England) Regulations 2007 (interpretation) in the definition of “special education needs provision type” for the words “pursuant to” to the end substitute ““The Special Educational Needs and Disability Code of Practice: 0-25 years” published on 29th July 2014 under section 77 of the Children and Families Act 2014”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.