The Heat Networks (Market Framework) (Great Britain) Regulations 2025
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
35 Appeals against penalties
(1) If the authorised person on whom a penalty is imposed is aggrieved by— (a) the imposition of the penalty; (b) the amount of the penalty; or (c) the date by which the penalty is required to be paid, or the different dates by which different portions of the penalty are required to be paid, the authorised person may make an application to the court under this regulation. (2) An application under paragraph (1) must be made— (a) within 42 days beginning with the date of service on the authorised person of a notice under regulation31(12); or (b) where the application relates to a decision of the Regulator on an application by the authorised person under regulation31(13), within 42 days beginning with the date the authorised person is notified of the decision. (3) On any such application, where the court considers it appropriate to do so in all the circumstances of the case and is satisfied of one or more of the grounds falling within paragraph(4), the court— (a) may quash the penalty; (b) may substitute a penalty of such lesser amount as the court considers appropriate in all the circumstances of the case; or (c) in the case of an application under paragraph (1)(c), may substitute for the date or dates imposed by the Regulator an alternative date or dates. (4) The grounds falling within this paragraph are— (a) that the imposition of the penalty was not within the power of the Regulator under regulation31; (b) that any of the requirements of regulation31(8) to (12) or (14) have not been complied with in relation to the imposition of the penalty and the interests of the authorised person have been substantially prejudiced by the non-compliance; or (c) that it was unreasonable of the Regulator to require the penalty imposed, or any portion of it, to be paid by the date or dates by which it was required to be paid. (5) If an application is made under this regulationin relation to a penalty, the penalty is not required to be paid until the application has been determined. (6) Where the court substitutes a penalty of a lesser amount it may require the payment of interest on the substituted penalty at such rate, and from such date, as it considers just and equitable. (7) Where the court specifies as a date by which the penalty, or a portion of the penalty, is to be paid a date before the determination of the application under this regulationit may require the payment of interest on the penalty, or portion, from that date at such rate as it considers just and equitable. (8) Except as provided by this regulation, the validity of a penalty is not to be questioned by any legal proceedings whatever.
35 Appeals against penalties
(1) If the authorised person on whom a penalty is imposed is aggrieved by— (a) the imposition of the penalty; (b) the amount of the penalty; or (c) the date by which the penalty is required to be paid, or the different dates by which different portions of the penalty are required to be paid, the authorised person may make an application to the court under this regulation. (2) An application under paragraph (1) must be made— (a) within 42 days beginning with the date of service on the authorised person of a notice under regulation31(12); or (b) where the application relates to a decision of the Regulator on an application by the authorised person under regulation31(13), within 42 days beginning with the date the authorised person is notified of the decision. (3) On any such application, where the court considers it appropriate to do so in all the circumstances of the case and is satisfied of one or more of the grounds falling within paragraph(4), the court— (a) may quash the penalty; (b) may substitute a penalty of such lesser amount as the court considers appropriate in all the circumstances of the case; or (c) in the case of an application under paragraph (1)(c), may substitute for the date or dates imposed by the Regulator an alternative date or dates. (4) The grounds falling within this paragraph are— (a) that the imposition of the penalty was not within the power of the Regulator under regulation31; (b) that any of the requirements of regulation31(8) to (12) or (14) have not been complied with in relation to the imposition of the penalty and the interests of the authorised person have been substantially prejudiced by the non-compliance; or (c) that it was unreasonable of the Regulator to require the penalty imposed, or any portion of it, to be paid by the date or dates by which it was required to be paid. (5) If an application is made under this regulationin relation to a penalty, the penalty is not required to be paid until the application has been determined. (6) Where the court substitutes a penalty of a lesser amount it may require the payment of interest on the substituted penalty at such rate, and from such date, as it considers just and equitable. (7) Where the court specifies as a date by which the penalty, or a portion of the penalty, is to be paid a date before the determination of the application under this regulationit may require the payment of interest on the penalty, or portion, from that date at such rate as it considers just and equitable. (8) Except as provided by this regulation, the validity of a penalty is not to be questioned by any legal proceedings whatever.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.