The National Health Service Pension Schemes (Remediable Service) Regulations 2023
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
8 Election for retrospective provision to apply to opted-out service
(1) A person mentioned in paragraph (2) may make an election in relation to relevant opted-out service of a member of the legacy scheme or the 2015 scheme (“an opted-out service election”) in accordance with this regulation. (2) That person is— (a) a member (“M”) who has a period or periods of employment or office that would have been pensionable and remediable service under the legacy scheme or the 2015 scheme had M not opted out of that scheme for that period, or those periods (“relevant opted-out service”), or (b) a designated person or such a person as would be a designated person were the relevant opted-out service considered remediable service where— (i) M is deceased and was not at the time of their death entitled to a retirement pension in respect of pensionable service under the legacy scheme or the 2015 scheme; (ii) M is deceased and was at the time of their death entitled to such a retirement pension; or (iii) M is, in the opinion of the scheme manager, by reason of illness or mental disorder or otherwise unable to look after their own affairs. (3) An opted-out service election may only be made if an application by or on behalf of M is made in a form and within a period determined, and accompanied by such information as is required, by the scheme manager. (4) The scheme manager— (a) may refuse the application if the condition in paragraph (5) is not met; (b) must, within six months of receiving the application, send to the person who made the application notice in writing about its outcome; (c) must, if the scheme manager accepts the application, include with that notice a remediable service statement in accordance with regulation 6. (5) The condition referred to in paragraph (4)(a) is that the scheme manager is satisfied that it is more likely than not that, but for an actual or anticipated relevant breach of a non-discrimination rule, M would not have made the decision to opt out of the legacy scheme or the 2015 scheme between 1st April 2015 and 31st March 2022 (those dates included). (6) That condition is met where M informed the scheme manager at any time between 1st October 2014 and 31st March 2022 (those dates included) of the decision by virtue of which M’s service became relevant opted-out service. (7) Where the scheme manager has accepted an application made under paragraph (3), the person mentioned in paragraph (2) may make an opted-out service election which must be— (a) made after a remediable service statement has been provided in accordance with paragraph (4)(c); (b) made before the end of the election period; and (c) in a form determined, and accompanied by such information as is required, by the scheme manager.
8 Election for retrospective provision to apply to opted-out service
(1) A person mentioned in paragraph (2) may make an election in relation to relevant opted-out service of a member of the legacy scheme or the 2015 scheme (“an opted-out service election”) in accordance with this regulation. (2) That person is— (a) a member (“M”) who has a period or periods of employment or office that would have been pensionable and remediable service under the legacy scheme or the 2015 scheme had M not opted out of that scheme for that period, or those periods (“relevant opted-out service”), or (b) a designated person or such a person as would be a designated person were the relevant opted-out service considered remediable service where— (i) M is deceased and was not at the time of their death entitled to a retirement pension in respect of pensionable service under the legacy scheme or the 2015 scheme; (ii) M is deceased and was at the time of their death entitled to such a retirement pension; or (iii) M is, in the opinion of the scheme manager, by reason of illness or mental disorder or otherwise unable to look after their own affairs. (3) An opted-out service election may only be made if an application by or on behalf of M is made in a form and within a period determined, and accompanied by such information as is required, by the scheme manager. (4) The scheme manager— (a) may refuse the application if the condition in paragraph (5) is not met; (b) must, within six months of receiving the application, send to the person who made the application notice in writing about its outcome; (c) must, if the scheme manager accepts the application, include with that notice a remediable service statement in accordance with regulation 6. (5) The condition referred to in paragraph (4)(a) is that the scheme manager is satisfied that it is more likely than not that, but for an actual or anticipated relevant breach of a non-discrimination rule, M would not have made the decision to opt out of the legacy scheme or the 2015 scheme between 1st April 2015 and 31st March 2022 (those dates included). (6) That condition is met where M informed the scheme manager at any time between 1st October 2014 and 31st March 2022 (those dates included) of the decision by virtue of which M’s service became relevant opted-out service. (7) Where the scheme manager has accepted an application made under paragraph (3), the person mentioned in paragraph (2) may make an opted-out service election which must be— (a) made after a remediable service statement has been provided in accordance with paragraph (4)(c); (b) made before the end of the election period; and (c) in a form determined, and accompanied by such information as is required, by the scheme manager.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.