Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
46 Removal of powers of police in England and Wales to appoint traffic wardens
(1) Sections 95 to 97 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 (traffic wardens), so far as extending to England and Wales, are repealed.
(2) Those sections, so far as extending to Scotland, are amended as follows.
(3) In section 95 (appointment of traffic wardens), omit subsection (1).
(4) In subsection (2) of that section, for “any such functions as are mentioned in subsection (1) above” substitute “ , in aid of the police, functions normally undertaken by the police in connection with the control and regulation of, or the enforcement of the law relating to, traffic (including pedestrians) or stationary vehicles ”.
(5) In subsection (3) of that section, omit “under subsection (1) or”.
(6) In subsection (4) of that section—
(a) omit “(whether in England and Wales or in Scotland)”;
(b) for “subsection (1)” substitute “ subsection (2) ”;
(c) in paragraph (b)—
(i) omit “or (in England and Wales) with the Secretary of State”;
(ii) omit “or, as the case may be, by the Secretary of State”.
(7) Omit subsection (4A) of that section.
(8) In section 96 (additional powers of traffic wardens), in subsection (2), omit paragraphs (a), (b) and (d).
(9) In section 97 (supplementary provisions as to traffic wardens), in subsection (3), omit, in both places where it occurs, “the Common Council or”.
(10) Schedule 13 makes further amendments consequential on the repeal made by subsection (1).
Your change, as a redline
46 Removal of powers of police in England and Wales to appoint traffic wardens
(1) Sections 95 to 97 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 (traffic wardens), so far as extending to England and Wales, are repealed.
(2) Those sections, so far as extending to Scotland, are amended as follows.
(3) In section 95 (appointment of traffic wardens), omit subsection (1).
(4) In subsection (2) of that section, for “any such functions as are mentioned in subsection (1) above” substitute “ , in aid of the police, functions normally undertaken by the police in connection with the control and regulation of, or the enforcement of the law relating to, traffic (including pedestrians) or stationary vehicles ”.
(5) In subsection (3) of that section, omit “under subsection (1) or”.
(6) In subsection (4) of that section—
(a) omit “(whether in England and Wales or in Scotland)”;
(b) for “subsection (1)” substitute “ subsection (2) ”;
(c) in paragraph (b)—
(i) omit “or (in England and Wales) with the Secretary of State”;
(ii) omit “or, as the case may be, by the Secretary of State”.
(7) Omit subsection (4A) of that section.
(8) In section 96 (additional powers of traffic wardens), in subsection (2), omit paragraphs (a), (b) and (d).
(9) In section 97 (supplementary provisions as to traffic wardens), in subsection (3), omit, in both places where it occurs, “the Common Council or”.
(10) Schedule 13 makes further amendments consequential on the repeal made by subsection (1).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.