Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
68 Consent to processing for the purposes of scientific research
(1) Article 4 of the UK GDPR (definitions) is amended as follows.
(2) In point (11) of paragraph 1 (definition of “consent”), at the end insert “(and see paragraphs 6 and 7 of this Article)”.
(3) After paragraph 5 (inserted by section 67 of this Act) insert—
6. A data subject’s consent is to be treated as falling within the definition of “consent” in point (11) of paragraph 1 if—
(a) it does not fall within that definition because (and only because) the consent is given to the processing of personal data for the purposes of an area of scientific research,
(b) at the time the consent is sought, it is not possible to identify fully the purposes for which personal data is to be processed,
(c) seeking consent in relation to the area of scientific research is consistent with generally recognised ethical standards relevant to the area of research, and
(d) so far as the intended purposes of the processing allow, the data subject is given the opportunity to consent only to processing for part of the research.
7. References in this Regulation to consent given for a specific purpose (however expressed) include consent described in paragraph 6.
Your change, as a redline
68 Consent to processing for the purposes of scientific research
(1) Article 4 of the UK GDPR (definitions) is amended as follows.
(2) In point (11) of paragraph 1 (definition of “consent”), at the end insert “(and see paragraphs 6 and 7 of this Article)”.
(3) After paragraph 5 (inserted by section 67 of this Act) insert—
6. A data subject’s consent is to be treated as falling within the definition of “consent” in point (11) of paragraph 1 if—
(a) it does not fall within that definition because (and only because) the consent is given to the processing of personal data for the purposes of an area of scientific research,
(b) at the time the consent is sought, it is not possible to identify fully the purposes for which personal data is to be processed,
(c) seeking consent in relation to the area of scientific research is consistent with generally recognised ethical standards relevant to the area of research, and
(d) so far as the intended purposes of the processing allow, the data subject is given the opportunity to consent only to processing for part of the research.
7. References in this Regulation to consent given for a specific purpose (however expressed) include consent described in paragraph 6.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.