Data (Use and Access) Act 2025
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
79 Data subjects’ rights to information: legal professional privilege exemption
(1) The 2018 Act is amended as follows. (2) In section 43 (overview and scope of Chapter 3 of Part 3: rights of the data subject in connection with law enforcement processing)— (a) in subsection (1)(a), for “section 44” substitute “sections 44 and 45A”, and (b) in subsection (1)(b), for “section 45” substitute “sections 45 and 45A”. (3) For the italic heading before section 44 substitute— Data subject’s rights to information . (4) In the heading of section 44, omit “Information:”. (5) Omit the italic heading before section 45. (6) After that section insert— Exemption from sections 44 and 45: legal professional privilege 45A (1) Sections 44(2) and 45(1) do not require the controller to give the data subject— (a) information in respect of which a claim to legal professional privilege or, in Scotland, confidentiality of communications could be maintained in legal proceedings, or (b) information in respect of which a duty of confidentiality is owed by a professional legal adviser to a client of the adviser. (2) A controller relying on the exemption in subsection (1) must inform the data subject in writing without undue delay of— (a) the decision to rely on the exemption, (b) the reason for the decision, (c) the data subject’s right to make a request to the Commissioner under section 51, (d) the data subject’s right to lodge a complaint with the Commissioner under section 165, and (e) the data subject’s right to apply to a court under section 167. (3) Subsection (2)(a) and (b) do not apply to the extent that complying with them would— (a) undermine a claim described in subsection (1)(a), or (b) conflict with a duty described in subsection (1)(b). (4) The controller must— (a) record the reason for a decision to rely on the exemption in subsection (1), and (b) if requested to do so by the Commissioner, make the record available to the Commissioner. (5) The reference in subsection (1) to sections 44(2) and 45(1) includes sections 35 to 40 so far as their provisions correspond to the rights and obligations provided for in sections 44(2) and 45(1). (7) In section 51 (exercise of rights through the Commissioner)— (a) in subsection (1), after paragraph (b) (but before the “or” at the end of that paragraph) insert— (ba) relies on the exemption from sections 44(2) and 45(1) in section 45A (legal professional privilege), , (b) in subsection (2), after paragraph (a) insert— (aa) where subsection (1)(ba) applies, request the Commissioner to check that the controller was entitled to rely on the exemption; , (c) in subsection (4), after paragraph (a) insert— (aa) where subsection (1)(ba) applies, whether the Commissioner is satisfied that the controller was entitled to rely on the exemption; , and (d) in subsection (6), after “(a)” insert “, (aa)”.
79 Data subjects’ rights to information: legal professional privilege exemption
(1) The 2018 Act is amended as follows. (2) In section 43 (overview and scope of Chapter 3 of Part 3: rights of the data subject in connection with law enforcement processing)— (a) in subsection (1)(a), for “section 44” substitute “sections 44 and 45A”, and (b) in subsection (1)(b), for “section 45” substitute “sections 45 and 45A”. (3) For the italic heading before section 44 substitute— Data subject’s rights to information . (4) In the heading of section 44, omit “Information:”. (5) Omit the italic heading before section 45. (6) After that section insert— Exemption from sections 44 and 45: legal professional privilege 45A (1) Sections 44(2) and 45(1) do not require the controller to give the data subject— (a) information in respect of which a claim to legal professional privilege or, in Scotland, confidentiality of communications could be maintained in legal proceedings, or (b) information in respect of which a duty of confidentiality is owed by a professional legal adviser to a client of the adviser. (2) A controller relying on the exemption in subsection (1) must inform the data subject in writing without undue delay of— (a) the decision to rely on the exemption, (b) the reason for the decision, (c) the data subject’s right to make a request to the Commissioner under section 51, (d) the data subject’s right to lodge a complaint with the Commissioner under section 165, and (e) the data subject’s right to apply to a court under section 167. (3) Subsection (2)(a) and (b) do not apply to the extent that complying with them would— (a) undermine a claim described in subsection (1)(a), or (b) conflict with a duty described in subsection (1)(b). (4) The controller must— (a) record the reason for a decision to rely on the exemption in subsection (1), and (b) if requested to do so by the Commissioner, make the record available to the Commissioner. (5) The reference in subsection (1) to sections 44(2) and 45(1) includes sections 35 to 40 so far as their provisions correspond to the rights and obligations provided for in sections 44(2) and 45(1). (7) In section 51 (exercise of rights through the Commissioner)— (a) in subsection (1), after paragraph (b) (but before the “or” at the end of that paragraph) insert— (ba) relies on the exemption from sections 44(2) and 45(1) in section 45A (legal professional privilege), , (b) in subsection (2), after paragraph (a) insert— (aa) where subsection (1)(ba) applies, request the Commissioner to check that the controller was entitled to rely on the exemption; , (c) in subsection (4), after paragraph (a) insert— (aa) where subsection (1)(ba) applies, whether the Commissioner is satisfied that the controller was entitled to rely on the exemption; , and (d) in subsection (6), after “(a)” insert “, (aa)”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.