Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
81 Data protection by design: children’s higher protection matters
(1) Article 25 of the UK GDPR (data protection by design and by default) is amended as follows.
(2) After paragraph 1 insert—
1A. In the case of processing carried out in the course of providing information society services which are likely to be accessed by children, when assessing what are appropriate technical and organisational measures in accordance with paragraph 1, the controller must take into account the children’s higher protection matters.
1B. The children’s higher protection matters are—
(a) how children can best be protected and supported when using the services, and
(b) the fact that children—
(i) merit specific protection with regard to their personal data because they may be less aware of the risks and consequences associated with processing of personal data and of their rights in relation to such processing, and
(ii) have different needs at different ages and at different stages of development.
(3) In paragraph 3, for “1 and 2” substitute “1 to 2”.
(4) At the end insert—
4. Paragraphs 1A and 1B are not to be read as implying anything about the matters that may be relevant to the assessment of what are appropriate technical and organisational measures for the purposes of paragraph 1 in cases other than those described in paragraph 1A.
5. In this Article, “information society services” does not include preventive or counselling services.
Your change, as a redline
81 Data protection by design: children’s higher protection matters
(1) Article 25 of the UK GDPR (data protection by design and by default) is amended as follows.
(2) After paragraph 1 insert—
1A. In the case of processing carried out in the course of providing information society services which are likely to be accessed by children, when assessing what are appropriate technical and organisational measures in accordance with paragraph 1, the controller must take into account the children’s higher protection matters.
1B. The children’s higher protection matters are—
(a) how children can best be protected and supported when using the services, and
(b) the fact that children—
(i) merit specific protection with regard to their personal data because they may be less aware of the risks and consequences associated with processing of personal data and of their rights in relation to such processing, and
(ii) have different needs at different ages and at different stages of development.
(3) In paragraph 3, for “1 and 2” substitute “1 to 2”.
(4) At the end insert—
4. Paragraphs 1A and 1B are not to be read as implying anything about the matters that may be relevant to the assessment of what are appropriate technical and organisational measures for the purposes of paragraph 1 in cases other than those described in paragraph 1A.
5. In this Article, “information society services” does not include preventive or counselling services.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.