Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
87 Section 86: consequential provision
(1) In the UK GDPR—
(a) in Article 5(1)(e) (storage limitation), for “Article 89(1)” to “data subject” substitute “Article 84B”,
(b) in Article 9(2)(j) (processing of special categories of personal data), for “in accordance with Article 89(1) (as supplemented by section 19 of the 2018 Act)” substitute “, is carried out in accordance with Article 84B and is”,
(c) in Article 17(3)(d) (right to erasure), for “Article 89(1)” substitute “Article 84B”, and
(d) in Article 21(6) (right to object), omit “pursuant to Article 89(1)”.
(2) In the 2018 Act—
(a) in section 24(4) (manual unstructured data held by FOI public authorities), after paragraph (b) insert—
(ba) Chapter 8A (safeguards for processing for research, archiving or statistical purposes);
,
(b) in paragraph 4(b) of Schedule 1 (special categories of personal data and criminal convictions etc data: research etc), for “Article 89(1) of the UK GDPR (as supplemented by section 19)” substitute “Article 84B of the UK GDPR”, and
(c) in Schedule 2 (exemptions etc from the UK GDPR)—
(i) in paragraph 27(3)(a) (research and statistics), for “Article 89(1) of the UK GDPR (as supplemented by section 19)” substitute “Article 84B of the UK GDPR”, and
(ii) in paragraph 28(3) (archiving), for “Article 89(1) of the UK GDPR (as supplemented by section 19)” substitute “Article 84B of the UK GDPR”.
(3) In section 279(2) of the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003 (asp 13) (information for research), for “Article 89(1) of the UK GDPR (archiving in the public interest, scientific or historical research and statistics)” substitute “Article 84A of the UK GDPR (research, archives and statistics)”.
Your change, as a redline
87 Section 86: consequential provision
(1) In the UK GDPR—
(a) in Article 5(1)(e) (storage limitation), for “Article 89(1)” to “data subject” substitute “Article 84B”,
(b) in Article 9(2)(j) (processing of special categories of personal data), for “in accordance with Article 89(1) (as supplemented by section 19 of the 2018 Act)” substitute “, is carried out in accordance with Article 84B and is”,
(c) in Article 17(3)(d) (right to erasure), for “Article 89(1)” substitute “Article 84B”, and
(d) in Article 21(6) (right to object), omit “pursuant to Article 89(1)”.
(2) In the 2018 Act—
(a) in section 24(4) (manual unstructured data held by FOI public authorities), after paragraph (b) insert—
(ba) Chapter 8A (safeguards for processing for research, archiving or statistical purposes);
,
(b) in paragraph 4(b) of Schedule 1 (special categories of personal data and criminal convictions etc data: research etc), for “Article 89(1) of the UK GDPR (as supplemented by section 19)” substitute “Article 84B of the UK GDPR”, and
(c) in Schedule 2 (exemptions etc from the UK GDPR)—
(i) in paragraph 27(3)(a) (research and statistics), for “Article 89(1) of the UK GDPR (as supplemented by section 19)” substitute “Article 84B of the UK GDPR”, and
(ii) in paragraph 28(3) (archiving), for “Article 89(1) of the UK GDPR (as supplemented by section 19)” substitute “Article 84B of the UK GDPR”.
(3) In section 279(2) of the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003 (asp 13) (information for research), for “Article 89(1) of the UK GDPR (archiving in the public interest, scientific or historical research and statistics)” substitute “Article 84A of the UK GDPR (research, archives and statistics)”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.