Road Traffic (Vehicle Testing) Act 1999
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
Consequential amendments
Road Traffic Act 1988 (c. 52) 3 For section 177 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 there is substituted— Impersonation of authorised examiner, etc. 177 A person is guilty of an offence if, with intent to deceive, he falsely represents himself— (a) to be, or to be employed by, a person authorised in accordance with regulations made under section 41 of this Act with respect to the checking and sealing of speed limiters, or (b) to be a person entitled under section 45 of this Act to carry out examinations of vehicles under that section.
Consequential amendments
Road Traffic Act 1988 (c. 52) 3 For section 177 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 there is substituted— Impersonation of authorised examiner, etc. 177 A person is guilty of an offence if, with intent to deceive, he falsely represents himself— (a) to be, or to be employed by, a person authorised in accordance with regulations made under section 41 of this Act with respect to the checking and sealing of speed limiters, or (b) to be a person entitled under section 45 of this Act to carry out examinations of vehicles under that section.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.