Propose a change

The Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Ring-fenced Bodies and Core Activities) Order 2014

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

13 Deposits excluded from determination of core deposit level

(1) For the purpose of determining the average core deposit total for a UK deposit-taker the quarterly totals referred to in article 12(3) do not include deposits if— (a) the deposits concerned are held by the UK deposit-taker as a result of the transfer to it of all or part of the business of another institution, other than by way of an excluded transfer; and (b) not more than four years have passed since the date of completion of that transfer. (2) For the purpose of calculating the sum referred to in article 12(1)(b) the average core deposit total for a UK deposit-taker is not included if— (a) the relevant UK deposit-taker (the “target institution”) became a member of the group concerned as a result of another member of that group (the “acquiring institution”) acquiring securities issued by the target institution; (b) at the date of that acquisition the target institution was not a ring-fenced body; (c) that acquisition would, but for the provisions of this paragraph, have resulted in the group of which the acquiring institution is a member ceasing to meet the condition in article 12(1)(b); and (d) not more than four years have passed since the date of completion of the acquisition. (3) In this article “excluded transfer” means a transfer which is made— (a) by way of a ring-fencing transfer scheme; or (b) to a UK deposit-taker from an institution which is a member of the same group as the UK deposit-taker as at the date of the transfer.

Your change, as a redline

13 Deposits excluded from determination of core deposit level

(1) For the purpose of determining the average core deposit total for a UK deposit-taker the quarterly totals referred to in article 12(3) do not include deposits if— (a) the deposits concerned are held by the UK deposit-taker as a result of the transfer to it of all or part of the business of another institution, other than by way of an excluded transfer; and (b) not more than four years have passed since the date of completion of that transfer. (2) For the purpose of calculating the sum referred to in article 12(1)(b) the average core deposit total for a UK deposit-taker is not included if— (a) the relevant UK deposit-taker (the “target institution”) became a member of the group concerned as a result of another member of that group (the “acquiring institution”) acquiring securities issued by the target institution; (b) at the date of that acquisition the target institution was not a ring-fenced body; (c) that acquisition would, but for the provisions of this paragraph, have resulted in the group of which the acquiring institution is a member ceasing to meet the condition in article 12(1)(b); and (d) not more than four years have passed since the date of completion of the acquisition. (3) In this article “excluded transfer” means a transfer which is made— (a) by way of a ring-fencing transfer scheme; or (b) to a UK deposit-taker from an institution which is a member of the same group as the UK deposit-taker as at the date of the transfer.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds