The Social Security (Further Methods of Recovery) Regulations 2026
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
11 Applications for reviews
(1) Where an account holder applies to the Secretary of State for a review of a direct deduction order under paragraph 18 of Schedule 3ZA (reviews), the application must— (a) include the grounds for seeking the review, (b) include any information or evidence which the account holder wishes to be considered by the Secretary of State as part of the review, and (c) subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), be made in the manner specified in the direct deduction order or varied direct deduction order (or as provided under regulation 7(7)), or in the notice of the decision not to vary a direct deduction order in response to an application under paragraph 12(1) of Schedule 3ZA (applications to vary). (2) Where the Secretary of State has required or permitted an account holder to apply for a review other than in writing, the Secretary of State may subsequently invite the account holder to provide any supporting evidence which the account holder wishes to be considered by the Secretary of State as part of the review using a method the Secretary of State considers appropriate. (3) Where an account holder provides evidence in accordance with paragraph (2), and within the period set out in paragraph 18(3) of Schedule 3ZA, the Secretary of State must consider the evidence provided as part of the review.
11 Applications for reviews
(1) Where an account holder applies to the Secretary of State for a review of a direct deduction order under paragraph 18 of Schedule 3ZA (reviews), the application must— (a) include the grounds for seeking the review, (b) include any information or evidence which the account holder wishes to be considered by the Secretary of State as part of the review, and (c) subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), be made in the manner specified in the direct deduction order or varied direct deduction order (or as provided under regulation 7(7)), or in the notice of the decision not to vary a direct deduction order in response to an application under paragraph 12(1) of Schedule 3ZA (applications to vary). (2) Where the Secretary of State has required or permitted an account holder to apply for a review other than in writing, the Secretary of State may subsequently invite the account holder to provide any supporting evidence which the account holder wishes to be considered by the Secretary of State as part of the review using a method the Secretary of State considers appropriate. (3) Where an account holder provides evidence in accordance with paragraph (2), and within the period set out in paragraph 18(3) of Schedule 3ZA, the Secretary of State must consider the evidence provided as part of the review.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.