The Employment Tribunals and Employment Appeal Tribunal (Composition of Tribunal) Regulations 2024
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
6 Tribunal consisting of two or more members
(1) Subject to paragraph (2), where a matter in the employment tribunal or Appeal Tribunal, as the case may be, is to be decided by more than one member, the number of members who are to be judges and the number of members who are not judges must be determined by the Senior President of Tribunals in a direction. (2) At least one of the members must be a judge. (3) Without prejudice to regulations 8(2)(b) and (c) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 or, as the case may be, section 22(2) of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996, the Senior President of Tribunals may in a direction in accordance with regulation 3(1) or, as the case may be, regulation 4(2), determine whether members who are not judges must have any qualifications and, if so, what those qualifications must be. (4) The Senior President of Tribunals must select one of the members (the “presiding member”) to chair the tribunal. (5) If the decision of the tribunal is not unanimous, the decision of the majority is the decision of the tribunal; and the presiding member has a casting vote if the votes are equally divided. (6) In this regulation, “judge” means an Employment Judge as it applies to the employment tribunal and as it applies to the Appeal Tribunal a judge of that tribunal. (7) In paragraphs (4) and (5), “tribunal” includes a Tribunal of the Appeal Tribunal.
6 Tribunal consisting of two or more members
(1) Subject to paragraph (2), where a matter in the employment tribunal or Appeal Tribunal, as the case may be, is to be decided by more than one member, the number of members who are to be judges and the number of members who are not judges must be determined by the Senior President of Tribunals in a direction. (2) At least one of the members must be a judge. (3) Without prejudice to regulations 8(2)(b) and (c) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 or, as the case may be, section 22(2) of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996, the Senior President of Tribunals may in a direction in accordance with regulation 3(1) or, as the case may be, regulation 4(2), determine whether members who are not judges must have any qualifications and, if so, what those qualifications must be. (4) The Senior President of Tribunals must select one of the members (the “presiding member”) to chair the tribunal. (5) If the decision of the tribunal is not unanimous, the decision of the majority is the decision of the tribunal; and the presiding member has a casting vote if the votes are equally divided. (6) In this regulation, “judge” means an Employment Judge as it applies to the employment tribunal and as it applies to the Appeal Tribunal a judge of that tribunal. (7) In paragraphs (4) and (5), “tribunal” includes a Tribunal of the Appeal Tribunal.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.