Propose a change

Town and Country Planning Act 1990

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

225B Appeal against notice under section 225A

(1) A person on whom a removal notice has been served in accordance with section 225A(3) or (5)(b) may appeal to a magistrates' court on any of the following grounds— (a) that the display structure concerned is not used for the display of advertisements in contravention of regulations under section 220; (b) that there has been some informality, defect or error in, or in connection with, the notice; (c) that the period between the date of the notice and the time specified in the notice is not reasonably sufficient for the removal of the display structure; (d) that the notice should have been served on another person. (2) For the purposes of subsection (3), a person is a “permitted appellant” in relation to a removal notice if— (a) the removal notice has been fixed or exhibited in accordance with section 225A(5)(a); (b) the person is an owner or occupier of the land on which the display structure concerned is situated; and (c) no copy of the removal notice has been served on the person in accordance with section 225A(5)(b). (3) A person who is a permitted appellant in relation to a removal notice may appeal to a magistrates' court on any of the following grounds— (a) that the display structure concerned is not used for the display of advertisements in contravention of regulations under section 220; (b) that there has been some informality, defect or error in, or in connection with, the notice; (c) that the period between the date of the notice and the time specified in the notice is not reasonably sufficient for the removal of the display structure. (4) So far as an appeal under this section is based on the ground mentioned in subsection (1)(b) or (3)(b), the court must dismiss the appeal if it is satisfied that the informality, defect or error was not a material one. (5) If an appeal under subsection (1) is based on the ground mentioned in subsection (1)(d), the appellant must serve a copy of the notice of appeal on each person who the appellant considers is a person on whom the removal notice should have been served in accordance with section 225A(3) or (5)(b). (6) If— (a) a removal notice is served on a person in accordance with section 225A(3) or (5)(b), and (b) the local planning authority bring proceedings against the person for the recovery under section 225A(7) of any expenses, it is not open to the person to raise in the proceedings any question which the person could have raised in an appeal under subsection (1). (7) In this section “removal notice” and “display structure” have the same meaning as in section 225A.

Your change, as a redline

225B Appeal against notice under section 225A

(1) A person on whom a removal notice has been served in accordance with section 225A(3) or (5)(b) may appeal to a magistrates' court on any of the following grounds— (a) that the display structure concerned is not used for the display of advertisements in contravention of regulations under section 220; (b) that there has been some informality, defect or error in, or in connection with, the notice; (c) that the period between the date of the notice and the time specified in the notice is not reasonably sufficient for the removal of the display structure; (d) that the notice should have been served on another person. (2) For the purposes of subsection (3), a person is a “permitted appellant” in relation to a removal notice if— (a) the removal notice has been fixed or exhibited in accordance with section 225A(5)(a); (b) the person is an owner or occupier of the land on which the display structure concerned is situated; and (c) no copy of the removal notice has been served on the person in accordance with section 225A(5)(b). (3) A person who is a permitted appellant in relation to a removal notice may appeal to a magistrates' court on any of the following grounds— (a) that the display structure concerned is not used for the display of advertisements in contravention of regulations under section 220; (b) that there has been some informality, defect or error in, or in connection with, the notice; (c) that the period between the date of the notice and the time specified in the notice is not reasonably sufficient for the removal of the display structure. (4) So far as an appeal under this section is based on the ground mentioned in subsection (1)(b) or (3)(b), the court must dismiss the appeal if it is satisfied that the informality, defect or error was not a material one. (5) If an appeal under subsection (1) is based on the ground mentioned in subsection (1)(d), the appellant must serve a copy of the notice of appeal on each person who the appellant considers is a person on whom the removal notice should have been served in accordance with section 225A(3) or (5)(b). (6) If— (a) a removal notice is served on a person in accordance with section 225A(3) or (5)(b), and (b) the local planning authority bring proceedings against the person for the recovery under section 225A(7) of any expenses, it is not open to the person to raise in the proceedings any question which the person could have raised in an appeal under subsection (1). (7) In this section “removal notice” and “display structure” have the same meaning as in section 225A.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds