Propose a change

Town and Country Planning Act 1990

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

76B Major infrastructure projects: inspectors

(1) This section applies if the Secretary of State appoints an inspector under section 76A(4)(b) (the lead inspector). (2) The Secretary of State may direct the lead inspector— (a) to consider such matters relating to the application as are prescribed; (b) to make recommendations to the Secretary of State on those matters. (3) After considering any recommendations of the lead inspector the Secretary of State may— (a) appoint such number of additional inspectors as he thinks appropriate; (b) direct that each of the additional inspectors must consider such matters relating to the application as the lead inspector decides. (4) An additional inspector must— (a) comply with such directions as to procedural matters as the lead inspector gives; (b) report to the lead inspector on the matters he is appointed to consider. (5) A copy of directions given as mentioned in subsection (4)(a) must be given to— (a) the person who made the application; (b) the local planning authority; (c) any other person who requests it. (6) If the Secretary of State does not act under subsection (3) he must direct the lead inspector to consider the application on his own. (7) In every case the lead inspector must report to the Secretary of State on— (a) his consideration of the application; (b) the consideration of the additional inspectors (if any) of the matters mentioned in subsection (3)(b). (8) The function of the lead inspector in pursuance of subsection (2)— (a) may be exercised from time to time; (b) includes making recommendations as to the number of additional inspectors required from time to time. (9) The power of the Secretary of State under subsection (3) to appoint an additional inspector includes power to revoke such an appointment.

Your change, as a redline

76B Major infrastructure projects: inspectors

(1) This section applies if the Secretary of State appoints an inspector under section 76A(4)(b) (the lead inspector). (2) The Secretary of State may direct the lead inspector— (a) to consider such matters relating to the application as are prescribed; (b) to make recommendations to the Secretary of State on those matters. (3) After considering any recommendations of the lead inspector the Secretary of State may— (a) appoint such number of additional inspectors as he thinks appropriate; (b) direct that each of the additional inspectors must consider such matters relating to the application as the lead inspector decides. (4) An additional inspector must— (a) comply with such directions as to procedural matters as the lead inspector gives; (b) report to the lead inspector on the matters he is appointed to consider. (5) A copy of directions given as mentioned in subsection (4)(a) must be given to— (a) the person who made the application; (b) the local planning authority; (c) any other person who requests it. (6) If the Secretary of State does not act under subsection (3) he must direct the lead inspector to consider the application on his own. (7) In every case the lead inspector must report to the Secretary of State on— (a) his consideration of the application; (b) the consideration of the additional inspectors (if any) of the matters mentioned in subsection (3)(b). (8) The function of the lead inspector in pursuance of subsection (2)— (a) may be exercised from time to time; (b) includes making recommendations as to the number of additional inspectors required from time to time. (9) The power of the Secretary of State under subsection (3) to appoint an additional inspector includes power to revoke such an appointment.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds