The Patents (Amendment) (No. 2) Rules 2014
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
10 Opinions on prescribed matters
After rule 93(5), insert— (6) The prescribed matters for the purposes of section 74A(1) are as follows— (a) whether a particular act constitutes, or (if done) would constitute, an infringement of the patent; (b) whether, or to what extent, an invention for which the patent has been granted is not a patentable invention; (c) whether the specification of the patent discloses the invention clearly enough and completely enough for it to be performed by a person skilled in the art; (d) whether the matter disclosed in the specification of the patent extends beyond that disclosed in the application for the patent as filed or, if the patent was granted on a new application, in the earlier application as filed; (e) whether the protection conferred by the patent has been extended by an amendment which should not have been allowed; (f) whether a supplementary protection certificate is invalid under Article 15 of the Medicinal Products Regulation; and (g) whether a supplementary protection certificate is invalid under Article 15 of the Plant Protection Products Regulation.
10 Opinions on prescribed matters
After rule 93(5), insert— (6) The prescribed matters for the purposes of section 74A(1) are as follows— (a) whether a particular act constitutes, or (if done) would constitute, an infringement of the patent; (b) whether, or to what extent, an invention for which the patent has been granted is not a patentable invention; (c) whether the specification of the patent discloses the invention clearly enough and completely enough for it to be performed by a person skilled in the art; (d) whether the matter disclosed in the specification of the patent extends beyond that disclosed in the application for the patent as filed or, if the patent was granted on a new application, in the earlier application as filed; (e) whether the protection conferred by the patent has been extended by an amendment which should not have been allowed; (f) whether a supplementary protection certificate is invalid under Article 15 of the Medicinal Products Regulation; and (g) whether a supplementary protection certificate is invalid under Article 15 of the Plant Protection Products Regulation.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.