Propose a change

The Russia (Sanctions) (EU Exit) (Amendment) (No. 4) Regulations 2023

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

4 Amendment of regulation 21(1) (trade: interpretation)

(1) Regulation 21(1) is amended as follows. (2) In the definition of “goods relating to chemical and biological weapons”— (a) at the end of paragraph (b), for “;” substitute “,”; (b) after paragraph (b) insert— other than any thing for the time being specified in Schedule 2 to the Export Control Order 2008 or in Annex 1 of the Dual-Use Regulation; . (3) In the definition of “technology relating to chemical and biological weapons”, after “Schedule 3C” insert “(except any thing for the time being specified in Schedule 2 to the Export Control Order 2008 or in Annex 1 of the Dual-Use Regulation)”. (4) In the provisions of the definitions specified in paragraph (5), omit “or 3”. (5) Those provisions are— (a) paragraph (a)(ii)(aa) of the definition of “critical-industry goods”; (b) paragraph (a) of the definition of “critical-industry technology”; (c) paragraph (a) of the definition of “G7 dependency and further goods”; (d) paragraph (a)(ii)(aa) of the definition of “quantum computing and advanced materials goods”; (e) paragraph (a) of the definition of “quantum computing and advanced materials technology”; and (f) paragraph (a) of the definition of “Russia’s vulnerable goods”. (6) In paragraph (a) of the definition of “luxury goods”, for “Schedules 2 or 3” substitute “Schedule 2”. (7) In paragraph (a) of the definition of “maritime goods” and “maritime technology”, for “Schedules 2 and 3” substitute “Schedule 2”. (8) In both— (a) paragraph (a)(ii)(aa) of the definition of “oil refining goods”; and (b) paragraph (a) of the definition of “oil refining technology”, for “3” substitute “2”.

Your change, as a redline

4 Amendment of regulation 21(1) (trade: interpretation)

(1) Regulation 21(1) is amended as follows. (2) In the definition of “goods relating to chemical and biological weapons”— (a) at the end of paragraph (b), for “;” substitute “,”; (b) after paragraph (b) insert— other than any thing for the time being specified in Schedule 2 to the Export Control Order 2008 or in Annex 1 of the Dual-Use Regulation; . (3) In the definition of “technology relating to chemical and biological weapons”, after “Schedule 3C” insert “(except any thing for the time being specified in Schedule 2 to the Export Control Order 2008 or in Annex 1 of the Dual-Use Regulation)”. (4) In the provisions of the definitions specified in paragraph (5), omit “or 3”. (5) Those provisions are— (a) paragraph (a)(ii)(aa) of the definition of “critical-industry goods”; (b) paragraph (a) of the definition of “critical-industry technology”; (c) paragraph (a) of the definition of “G7 dependency and further goods”; (d) paragraph (a)(ii)(aa) of the definition of “quantum computing and advanced materials goods”; (e) paragraph (a) of the definition of “quantum computing and advanced materials technology”; and (f) paragraph (a) of the definition of “Russia’s vulnerable goods”. (6) In paragraph (a) of the definition of “luxury goods”, for “Schedules 2 or 3” substitute “Schedule 2”. (7) In paragraph (a) of the definition of “maritime goods” and “maritime technology”, for “Schedules 2 and 3” substitute “Schedule 2”. (8) In both— (a) paragraph (a)(ii)(aa) of the definition of “oil refining goods”; and (b) paragraph (a) of the definition of “oil refining technology”, for “3” substitute “2”.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds