Bank of England Act 1998
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
3F Oversight functions: further provisions
(1) The documents to which the court of directors is to have access in the discharge of its oversight functions include documents considered, or to be considered, by the Financial Policy Committee , the Monetary Policy Committee or the Prudential Regulation Committee . (2) One or two members of the court of directors may attend any meeting of the Financial Policy Committee , the Monetary Policy Committee or the Prudential Regulation Committee for the purposes of exercising its oversight functions , but a person attending by virtue of this subsection may not speak unless invited to do so by the person chairing the meeting. (2A) But a member of the court of directors who has any direct or indirect interest (including any reasonably likely future interest) in any dealing or business which falls to be considered by the Prudential Regulation Committee may not, under the powers conferred by this section— (a) obtain access to any documents relating to the dealing or business, or (b) attend any proceedings of the Prudential Regulation Committee relating to any question arising from its consideration of the dealing or business. (3) Subsection (2) does not affect— (a) anything done in relation to the Financial Policy Committee , the Monetary Policy Committee or the Prudential Regulation Committee by a member of that Committee who is also a member of the court of directors, (b) the powers of the Financial Policy Committee under paragraph 13 of Schedule 2A, ... (c) the powers of the Monetary Policy Committee under paragraph 13A of Schedule 3, or (d) the powers of the Prudential Regulation Committee under paragraph 15(2) of Schedule 6A.
3F Oversight functions: further provisions
(1) The documents to which the court of directors is to have access in the discharge of its oversight functions include documents considered, or to be considered, by the Financial Policy Committee , the Monetary Policy Committee or the Prudential Regulation Committee . (2) One or two members of the court of directors may attend any meeting of the Financial Policy Committee , the Monetary Policy Committee or the Prudential Regulation Committee for the purposes of exercising its oversight functions , but a person attending by virtue of this subsection may not speak unless invited to do so by the person chairing the meeting. (2A) But a member of the court of directors who has any direct or indirect interest (including any reasonably likely future interest) in any dealing or business which falls to be considered by the Prudential Regulation Committee may not, under the powers conferred by this section— (a) obtain access to any documents relating to the dealing or business, or (b) attend any proceedings of the Prudential Regulation Committee relating to any question arising from its consideration of the dealing or business. (3) Subsection (2) does not affect— (a) anything done in relation to the Financial Policy Committee , the Monetary Policy Committee or the Prudential Regulation Committee by a member of that Committee who is also a member of the court of directors, (b) the powers of the Financial Policy Committee under paragraph 13 of Schedule 2A, ... (c) the powers of the Monetary Policy Committee under paragraph 13A of Schedule 3, or (d) the powers of the Prudential Regulation Committee under paragraph 15(2) of Schedule 6A.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.