Council Directive 92/94/EEC of 9 November 1992 amending Directive 75/273/EEC concerning the Community list of less- favoured farming areas within the meaning of Directive 75/268/EEC (Italy)
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
Avis juridique important | 31992L0094 Council Directive 92/94/EEC of 9 November 1992 amending Directive 75/273/EEC concerning the Community list of less- favoured farming areas within the meaning of Directive 75/268/EEC (Italy) Official Journal L 338 , 23/11/1992 P. 0042 - 0043 COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 92/94/EEC of 9 November 1992 amending Directive 75/273/EEC concerning the Community list of less-favoured farming areas within the meaning of Directive 75/268/EEC (Italy) THE CONCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, Having regard to Council Directive No 75/268/EEC of 28 April 1975 on mountain and hill farming and farming in certain less-favoured areas (1), and in particular Article 2 (2) thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (2), Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (3), Whereas Directive 75/273/EEC (4) lays down the areas in Italy which are included in the Community list of less-favoured areas within the meaning of Article 3 (3), (4) and (5) of Directive 75/268(EEC; Whereas the Italian Government has requested, in accordance with Article 2 (2) of Directive 75/268/EEC, that the Community list of areas in the Annex to Directive 75/273/EEC be amended; Whereas the new areas to be included in the list comply with the criteria and figures applied pursuant to Directive 75/273/EEC to determine areas within the meaning of Article 3 (4) of Directive 75/268/EEC; Whereas the amendment requested by the Italian Government represents 0,6 % of the utilizable agricultural areas in Italy; whereas, as a result of this request, all the successive extensions submitted by the Italian Government since the last amendment to Directive 75/273/EEC mean a total increase of more than 1,5 % of the utilizable agricultural area in Italy, HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE: Article 1 The list of less-favoured areas in Italy in the Annex to Directive 75/273/EEC is hereby supplemented to include the areas listed in the Annex to this Directive. Article 2 This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Italy. Done at Brussels, 9 November 1992. For the Council The President D. HURD (1) OJ No L 128, 19. 5. 1975, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 797/85 (OJ No L 93, 30. 3. 1985, p. 1).(2) OJ No C 225, 1. 9. 1992, p. 7.(3) Opinion delivered on 30 October 1992 (not yet published in the Official Journal).(4) OJ No L 128, 19. 5. 1975, p. 72. Amended by Directive 84/167/EEC (OJ No L 82, 28. 2. 1984, p. 1). ANNEX REGION OF BASILICATA PROVINCE OF MATERA Commune 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Ferrandina Grassano Grottole Irsina Matera Miglionico Pomarico Salandra
Avis juridique important | 31992L0094 Council Directive 92/94/EEC of 9 November 1992 amending Directive 75/273/EEC concerning the Community list of less- favoured farming areas within the meaning of Directive 75/268/EEC (Italy) Official Journal L 338 , 23/11/1992 P. 0042 - 0043 COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 92/94/EEC of 9 November 1992 amending Directive 75/273/EEC concerning the Community list of less-favoured farming areas within the meaning of Directive 75/268/EEC (Italy) THE CONCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, Having regard to Council Directive No 75/268/EEC of 28 April 1975 on mountain and hill farming and farming in certain less-favoured areas (1), and in particular Article 2 (2) thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (2), Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (3), Whereas Directive 75/273/EEC (4) lays down the areas in Italy which are included in the Community list of less-favoured areas within the meaning of Article 3 (3), (4) and (5) of Directive 75/268(EEC; Whereas the Italian Government has requested, in accordance with Article 2 (2) of Directive 75/268/EEC, that the Community list of areas in the Annex to Directive 75/273/EEC be amended; Whereas the new areas to be included in the list comply with the criteria and figures applied pursuant to Directive 75/273/EEC to determine areas within the meaning of Article 3 (4) of Directive 75/268/EEC; Whereas the amendment requested by the Italian Government represents 0,6 % of the utilizable agricultural areas in Italy; whereas, as a result of this request, all the successive extensions submitted by the Italian Government since the last amendment to Directive 75/273/EEC mean a total increase of more than 1,5 % of the utilizable agricultural area in Italy, HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE: Article 1 The list of less-favoured areas in Italy in the Annex to Directive 75/273/EEC is hereby supplemented to include the areas listed in the Annex to this Directive. Article 2 This Decision is addressed to the Republic of Italy. Done at Brussels, 9 November 1992. For the Council The President D. HURD (1) OJ No L 128, 19. 5. 1975, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 797/85 (OJ No L 93, 30. 3. 1985, p. 1).(2) OJ No C 225, 1. 9. 1992, p. 7.(3) Opinion delivered on 30 October 1992 (not yet published in the Official Journal).(4) OJ No L 128, 19. 5. 1975, p. 72. Amended by Directive 84/167/EEC (OJ No L 82, 28. 2. 1984, p. 1). ANNEX REGION OF BASILICATA PROVINCE OF MATERA Commune 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Ferrandina Grassano Grottole Irsina Matera Miglionico Pomarico Salandra
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.