Criminal Procedure (Intermediate Diets) (Scotland) Act 1998
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
1 Discretion to hold intermediate diets.
(1) In section 148 of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 (intermediate diets) (which consolidated section 337A of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1975)— (a) in subsection (1)— (i) for the words from the beginning to the word “trial”, where it first appears, there shall be substituted the words “ The court may, when adjourning a case for trial in terms of section 146(3) of this Act, and may also, at any time thereafter, whether before, on or after any date assigned as a trial diet ”; and (ii) for the words “the date assigned as the trial diet” there shall be substituted the words “ any date assigned as a trial diet ” (b) in subsection (7)(a), after the word “ “may””, there shall be inserted the words “ where it first appears, ”. (2) The amendments made by subsection (1) above shall be deemed always to have had effect. (3) Subsection (1) of the said section 337A shall be deemed always to have had effect as if enacted as follows— (1) The court may, when adjourning a case for trial in terms of section 337(b) of this Act, and may also, at any time thereafter, whether before, on or after any date assigned as a trial diet, fix a diet (to be known as an intermediate diet) for the purpose of ascertaining— (a) the state of preparation of the prosecutor and of the accused with respect to their cases; and (b) whether the accused intends to adhere to the plea of not guilty.
1 Discretion to hold intermediate diets.
(1) In section 148 of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 (intermediate diets) (which consolidated section 337A of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1975)— (a) in subsection (1)— (i) for the words from the beginning to the word “trial”, where it first appears, there shall be substituted the words “ The court may, when adjourning a case for trial in terms of section 146(3) of this Act, and may also, at any time thereafter, whether before, on or after any date assigned as a trial diet ”; and (ii) for the words “the date assigned as the trial diet” there shall be substituted the words “ any date assigned as a trial diet ” (b) in subsection (7)(a), after the word “ “may””, there shall be inserted the words “ where it first appears, ”. (2) The amendments made by subsection (1) above shall be deemed always to have had effect. (3) Subsection (1) of the said section 337A shall be deemed always to have had effect as if enacted as follows— (1) The court may, when adjourning a case for trial in terms of section 337(b) of this Act, and may also, at any time thereafter, whether before, on or after any date assigned as a trial diet, fix a diet (to be known as an intermediate diet) for the purpose of ascertaining— (a) the state of preparation of the prosecutor and of the accused with respect to their cases; and (b) whether the accused intends to adhere to the plea of not guilty.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.