The Judicial Pensions (Remediable Service etc.) Regulations 2023
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
2 Interpretation
(1) In these Regulations— “PSPJOA 2022” means the Public Service Pensions and Judicial Offices Act 2022; “the 2015 Regulations” means the Judicial Pensions Regulations 2015; “the 2015 scheme” means the scheme established by the 2015 Regulations; “FPJR 2017” means the Judicial Pensions (Fee-Paid Judges) Regulations 2017; “the PSP Directions 2022” means the Public Service Pensions (Exercise of Powers, Compensation and Information) Directions 2022; “appropriate Minister” has the meaning given in regulation 2 (interpretation) of the 2015 Regulations; “appropriate person” means— for the purposes of Part 4, R or, if R is deceased, R’s personal representatives; for all other purposes, P or, if P is deceased, P’s personal representatives; “Judicial Pension Board” means the Judicial Pension Board established by regulation 6(1) of the 2015 Regulations; “purported added pension payment” has the meaning given in paragraph 1 of Schedule 1 to the 2015 Regulations; “purported effective pension age payment” means a payment— which was made by either— a person “P” who has remediable service in a judicial office, or a relevant fee-paid judge who has relevant service in a judicial office, which was intended to be an effective pension age payment under Part 3 of Schedule 1 to the 2015 Regulations, and which was not in fact an effective pension age payment under Part 3 of Schedule 1 to the 2015 Regulations due to— a determination by a court or tribunal that, as a result of a non-discrimination rule, any person has rights under a judicial legacy scheme in respect of P’s remediable service, an agreement between the scheme manager of a judicial legacy scheme and any person that, as a result of a non-discrimination rule, the person has any rights under the scheme in respect of P’s remediable service, or the payment being made in relation to a relevant fee-paid judge; “purported special payment” means a payment— which was made by either— a person “P” who has remediable service in a judicial office, or a relevant fee-paid judge who has relevant service in a judicial office, which was intended to be a special payment under regulation 74(3)(a) or (c) of the 2015 Regulations, and which was not in fact a special payment under regulation 74(3)(a) or (c) due to— a determination by a court or tribunal that, as a result of a non-discrimination rule, any person has rights under a judicial legacy scheme in respect of P’s remediable service, an agreement between the scheme manager of a judicial legacy scheme and any person that, as a result of a non-discrimination rule, the person has any rights under the scheme in respect of P’s remediable service, or the payment being made in relation to a relevant fee-paid judge; “relevant service” has the meaning given in regulation 29(2); “scheme actuary” has the meaning given in regulation 2 (interpretation) of the 2015 Regulations; “scheme manager” has the meaning given in regulation 4 of the 2015 Regulations; “transfer value payment” has the meaning given in regulation 2 of the 2015 Regulations. (2) Except as provided for in these Regulations, expressions used in these Regulations have the same meaning as in Chapter 2 of Part 1 of PSPJOA 2022. (3) A reference in these Regulations to a provision of the PSP Directions 2022 is a reference to that provision as amended from time to time.
2 Interpretation
(1) In these Regulations— “PSPJOA 2022” means the Public Service Pensions and Judicial Offices Act 2022; “the 2015 Regulations” means the Judicial Pensions Regulations 2015; “the 2015 scheme” means the scheme established by the 2015 Regulations; “FPJR 2017” means the Judicial Pensions (Fee-Paid Judges) Regulations 2017; “the PSP Directions 2022” means the Public Service Pensions (Exercise of Powers, Compensation and Information) Directions 2022; “appropriate Minister” has the meaning given in regulation 2 (interpretation) of the 2015 Regulations; “appropriate person” means— for the purposes of Part 4, R or, if R is deceased, R’s personal representatives; for all other purposes, P or, if P is deceased, P’s personal representatives; “Judicial Pension Board” means the Judicial Pension Board established by regulation 6(1) of the 2015 Regulations; “purported added pension payment” has the meaning given in paragraph 1 of Schedule 1 to the 2015 Regulations; “purported effective pension age payment” means a payment— which was made by either— a person “P” who has remediable service in a judicial office, or a relevant fee-paid judge who has relevant service in a judicial office, which was intended to be an effective pension age payment under Part 3 of Schedule 1 to the 2015 Regulations, and which was not in fact an effective pension age payment under Part 3 of Schedule 1 to the 2015 Regulations due to— a determination by a court or tribunal that, as a result of a non-discrimination rule, any person has rights under a judicial legacy scheme in respect of P’s remediable service, an agreement between the scheme manager of a judicial legacy scheme and any person that, as a result of a non-discrimination rule, the person has any rights under the scheme in respect of P’s remediable service, or the payment being made in relation to a relevant fee-paid judge; “purported special payment” means a payment— which was made by either— a person “P” who has remediable service in a judicial office, or a relevant fee-paid judge who has relevant service in a judicial office, which was intended to be a special payment under regulation 74(3)(a) or (c) of the 2015 Regulations, and which was not in fact a special payment under regulation 74(3)(a) or (c) due to— a determination by a court or tribunal that, as a result of a non-discrimination rule, any person has rights under a judicial legacy scheme in respect of P’s remediable service, an agreement between the scheme manager of a judicial legacy scheme and any person that, as a result of a non-discrimination rule, the person has any rights under the scheme in respect of P’s remediable service, or the payment being made in relation to a relevant fee-paid judge; “relevant service” has the meaning given in regulation 29(2); “scheme actuary” has the meaning given in regulation 2 (interpretation) of the 2015 Regulations; “scheme manager” has the meaning given in regulation 4 of the 2015 Regulations; “transfer value payment” has the meaning given in regulation 2 of the 2015 Regulations. (2) Except as provided for in these Regulations, expressions used in these Regulations have the same meaning as in Chapter 2 of Part 1 of PSPJOA 2022. (3) A reference in these Regulations to a provision of the PSP Directions 2022 is a reference to that provision as amended from time to time.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.