The Judicial Pensions (Remediable Service etc.) Regulations 2023
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
21 Pension benefits and lump sum benefits
(1) This regulation applies where— (a) a notice in respect of an option to take partial retirement is treated as having been given in relation to P by virtue of regulation 18(2), (b) P is a pensioner member in relation to the judicial office, or (c) P is deceased. (2) Where— (a) the aggregate of the pension benefits that (after taking into account the effect, if any, of regulation 19(2) or (4)) have been paid under a judicial legacy scheme to any person (“the beneficiary”) in respect of P’s remediable service, exceeds (b) the aggregate of the pension benefits to which (after taking into account the effect, if any, of any immediate detriment remedy that has been obtained in relation to P’s remediable service) the beneficiary was entitled under the scheme in respect of the service, the beneficiary must pay the difference to the scheme. (3) Where— (a) the amount mentioned in sub-paragraph (2)(a), is less than (b) the amount mentioned in sub-paragraph (2)(b), the scheme manager must pay the difference to the beneficiary. (4) Where— (a) the aggregate of the lump sum benefits that (after taking into account the effect, if any, of regulation 19(2) or (4)) have been paid under a judicial legacy scheme to any person (“the beneficiary”) in respect of P’s remediable service, exceeds (b) the aggregate of the lump sum benefits to which (after taking into account the effect, if any, of any immediate detriment remedy that has been obtained in relation to P’s remediable service) the beneficiary was entitled under the scheme in respect of the service, the beneficiary must pay the difference to the scheme. (5) Where— (a) the amount mentioned in sub-paragraph (4)(a), is less than (b) the amount mentioned in sub-paragraph (4)(b), the scheme manager must pay the difference to the beneficiary.
21 Pension benefits and lump sum benefits
(1) This regulation applies where— (a) a notice in respect of an option to take partial retirement is treated as having been given in relation to P by virtue of regulation 18(2), (b) P is a pensioner member in relation to the judicial office, or (c) P is deceased. (2) Where— (a) the aggregate of the pension benefits that (after taking into account the effect, if any, of regulation 19(2) or (4)) have been paid under a judicial legacy scheme to any person (“the beneficiary”) in respect of P’s remediable service, exceeds (b) the aggregate of the pension benefits to which (after taking into account the effect, if any, of any immediate detriment remedy that has been obtained in relation to P’s remediable service) the beneficiary was entitled under the scheme in respect of the service, the beneficiary must pay the difference to the scheme. (3) Where— (a) the amount mentioned in sub-paragraph (2)(a), is less than (b) the amount mentioned in sub-paragraph (2)(b), the scheme manager must pay the difference to the beneficiary. (4) Where— (a) the aggregate of the lump sum benefits that (after taking into account the effect, if any, of regulation 19(2) or (4)) have been paid under a judicial legacy scheme to any person (“the beneficiary”) in respect of P’s remediable service, exceeds (b) the aggregate of the lump sum benefits to which (after taking into account the effect, if any, of any immediate detriment remedy that has been obtained in relation to P’s remediable service) the beneficiary was entitled under the scheme in respect of the service, the beneficiary must pay the difference to the scheme. (5) Where— (a) the amount mentioned in sub-paragraph (4)(a), is less than (b) the amount mentioned in sub-paragraph (4)(b), the scheme manager must pay the difference to the beneficiary.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.