The Judicial Pensions (Remediable Service etc.) Regulations 2023
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
47 Interpretation of Part
(1) In this Part— “amount of credited pension” has the meaning given in regulation 2 of the 2015 Regulations; “appropriate amount” means the amount calculated under section 29(2) and (3) of WRPA 1999 in respect of a pension sharing order; “cash equivalent” means a value calculated by virtue of section 30 of WRPA 1999; “corresponding pension debit member”, in relation to a relevant pension credit member, means the person mentioned in paragraph (b) of the definition of “relevant pension credit member”; “pension credit” and “pension debit” have the meanings given in section 57(7) of PSPJOA 2022; “pension sharing order” means an order or provision by virtue of which section 29 of WRPA 1999 applies to a relevant pension credit member and the corresponding pension debit member; “relevant benefits” means— where P was in pensionable service on the transfer day, the benefits or future benefits to which P was entitled under a judicial scheme by virtue of P’s shareable rights in the scheme in respect of P’s service beginning on 1st April 2015 and ending on the day before the transfer day; otherwise, the benefits or future benefits to which P was entitled under a judicial scheme by virtue of P’s shareable rights in the scheme in respect of P’s service beginning on 1st April 2015 and ending on the last day of P’s service; “relevant pension credit member”, in relation to a judicial scheme, means a person who has rights under the scheme— which are attributable (directly or indirectly) to a pension credit, and the value of which was determined (to any extent) by reference to the value of benefits payable in respect of the remediable service or relevant service in a judicial office of another person; “relevant period” means— where P has remediable service and an immediate detriment remedy has not been obtained in relation to that service, the election period in relation to P, and otherwise, the notification period in relation to P; “shareable rights” has the meaning given in section 27(2) of WRPA 1999; “transfer day”, in relation to a pension sharing order, means the day on which the relevant pension sharing order takes effect; “valuation day” has the meaning given in section 29(7) of WRPA 1999 in respect of a pension credit member and the corresponding debit member. (2) For the purposes of this Part, the “notification period”, in relation to P, has the meaning given— (a) where P has remediable service and an immediate detriment remedy has been obtained in relation to that service, in regulation 14(2) and (3); (b) where P has relevant service, in regulation 30(2)(b) and (c).
47 Interpretation of Part
(1) In this Part— “amount of credited pension” has the meaning given in regulation 2 of the 2015 Regulations; “appropriate amount” means the amount calculated under section 29(2) and (3) of WRPA 1999 in respect of a pension sharing order; “cash equivalent” means a value calculated by virtue of section 30 of WRPA 1999; “corresponding pension debit member”, in relation to a relevant pension credit member, means the person mentioned in paragraph (b) of the definition of “relevant pension credit member”; “pension credit” and “pension debit” have the meanings given in section 57(7) of PSPJOA 2022; “pension sharing order” means an order or provision by virtue of which section 29 of WRPA 1999 applies to a relevant pension credit member and the corresponding pension debit member; “relevant benefits” means— where P was in pensionable service on the transfer day, the benefits or future benefits to which P was entitled under a judicial scheme by virtue of P’s shareable rights in the scheme in respect of P’s service beginning on 1st April 2015 and ending on the day before the transfer day; otherwise, the benefits or future benefits to which P was entitled under a judicial scheme by virtue of P’s shareable rights in the scheme in respect of P’s service beginning on 1st April 2015 and ending on the last day of P’s service; “relevant pension credit member”, in relation to a judicial scheme, means a person who has rights under the scheme— which are attributable (directly or indirectly) to a pension credit, and the value of which was determined (to any extent) by reference to the value of benefits payable in respect of the remediable service or relevant service in a judicial office of another person; “relevant period” means— where P has remediable service and an immediate detriment remedy has not been obtained in relation to that service, the election period in relation to P, and otherwise, the notification period in relation to P; “shareable rights” has the meaning given in section 27(2) of WRPA 1999; “transfer day”, in relation to a pension sharing order, means the day on which the relevant pension sharing order takes effect; “valuation day” has the meaning given in section 29(7) of WRPA 1999 in respect of a pension credit member and the corresponding debit member. (2) For the purposes of this Part, the “notification period”, in relation to P, has the meaning given— (a) where P has remediable service and an immediate detriment remedy has been obtained in relation to that service, in regulation 14(2) and (3); (b) where P has relevant service, in regulation 30(2)(b) and (c).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.