The English Devolution and Community Empowerment Act 2026 (Consequential Amendments and Revocations) (England) Regulations 2026
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
11 Amendment of the Greater Manchester Combined Authority (Functions and Amendment) Order 2017
(1) The Greater Manchester Combined Authority (Functions and Amendment) Order 2017 is amended as follows. (2) In Part 1 (general), in article 2 (interpretation), omit the following definitions— (a) “the 1999 Act”; (b) “the 2000 Act”; (c) “the 2003 Act”; (d) “the 2011 Act”; (e) “Corporation”. (3) Omit Part 2 (mayoral development corporation). (4) Omit Part 3 (grants). (5) In Part 5 (funding), in article 12 (funding)— (a) in paragraph (1), for the words from “any reasonably” to “this Order” substitute “the costs of the GMCA reasonably attributable to the exercise of its functions are met,”; (b) in paragraph (2), for “the functions specified in articles 15(1)” substitute “any mayoral function”. (6) In Part 6 (data sharing; delegation of functions; mayoral functions)— (a) in article 13 (data sharing), omit paragraphs (1) to (3); (b) in article 15 (functions exercisable only by the mayor)— (i) omit paragraph (1); (ii) in paragraph (2)— (aa) in the words before sub-paragraph (a), for “general functions” substitute “any mayoral function”; (bb) omit sub-paragraph (a); (cc) in sub-paragraph (b), for “the general functions” substitute “any mayoral function”; (iii) omit paragraph (3); (iv) in paragraph (5), omit the words from “for the purposes” to “(1) or”. (7) Omit the Schedule (modification of the application of Part 8 of the Localism Act 2011).
11 Amendment of the Greater Manchester Combined Authority (Functions and Amendment) Order 2017
(1) The Greater Manchester Combined Authority (Functions and Amendment) Order 2017 is amended as follows. (2) In Part 1 (general), in article 2 (interpretation), omit the following definitions— (a) “the 1999 Act”; (b) “the 2000 Act”; (c) “the 2003 Act”; (d) “the 2011 Act”; (e) “Corporation”. (3) Omit Part 2 (mayoral development corporation). (4) Omit Part 3 (grants). (5) In Part 5 (funding), in article 12 (funding)— (a) in paragraph (1), for the words from “any reasonably” to “this Order” substitute “the costs of the GMCA reasonably attributable to the exercise of its functions are met,”; (b) in paragraph (2), for “the functions specified in articles 15(1)” substitute “any mayoral function”. (6) In Part 6 (data sharing; delegation of functions; mayoral functions)— (a) in article 13 (data sharing), omit paragraphs (1) to (3); (b) in article 15 (functions exercisable only by the mayor)— (i) omit paragraph (1); (ii) in paragraph (2)— (aa) in the words before sub-paragraph (a), for “general functions” substitute “any mayoral function”; (bb) omit sub-paragraph (a); (cc) in sub-paragraph (b), for “the general functions” substitute “any mayoral function”; (iii) omit paragraph (3); (iv) in paragraph (5), omit the words from “for the purposes” to “(1) or”. (7) Omit the Schedule (modification of the application of Part 8 of the Localism Act 2011).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.