Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Act 2011
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
20 Reviews of operation of Act
(1) The Secretary of State must appoint a person to review the operation of this Act (“the independent reviewer”). (1A) The independent reviewer must carry out a review under this section in respect of each calendar year starting with 2022 and ending with 2026. Each review must be completed as soon as reasonably practicable after the year to which it relates. (2) In each calendar year after 2026 the independent reviewer must, by 31 January, inform the Secretary of State what (if any) reviews under this section the reviewer intends to carry out in that year. Those reviews must be completed during that year or as soon as reasonably practicable after the end of it. (4) The independent reviewer must send to the Secretary of State a report on the outcome of each review carried out under this section as soon as reasonably practicable after completion of the review. (5) On receiving a report under subsection (4), the Secretary of State must lay a copy of it before Parliament. (6) The Secretary of State may pay to the independent reviewer— (a) expenses incurred in carrying out the functions of the reviewer under this section, and (b) such allowances as the Secretary of State determines. (7) Subsection (1A) does not require a review to be carried out in respect of any calendar year during the whole of which the Secretary of State's TPIM powers (within the meaning given by section 21(8)) do not exist because of their expiry or repeal under section 21. (7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (8) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (9) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
20 Reviews of operation of Act
(1) The Secretary of State must appoint a person to review the operation of this Act (“the independent reviewer”). (1A) The independent reviewer must carry out a review under this section in respect of each calendar year starting with 2022 and ending with 2026. Each review must be completed as soon as reasonably practicable after the year to which it relates. (2) In each calendar year after 2026 the independent reviewer must, by 31 January, inform the Secretary of State what (if any) reviews under this section the reviewer intends to carry out in that year. Those reviews must be completed during that year or as soon as reasonably practicable after the end of it. (4) The independent reviewer must send to the Secretary of State a report on the outcome of each review carried out under this section as soon as reasonably practicable after completion of the review. (5) On receiving a report under subsection (4), the Secretary of State must lay a copy of it before Parliament. (6) The Secretary of State may pay to the independent reviewer— (a) expenses incurred in carrying out the functions of the reviewer under this section, and (b) such allowances as the Secretary of State determines. (7) Subsection (1A) does not require a review to be carried out in respect of any calendar year during the whole of which the Secretary of State's TPIM powers (within the meaning given by section 21(8)) do not exist because of their expiry or repeal under section 21. (7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (8) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (9) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.