Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Act 2011
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
9 Review hearing
(1) On a review hearing held in compliance with directions under section 8(4), the function of the court is to review the decisions of the Secretary of State that the relevant conditions were met and continue to be met. (2) In doing so, the court must apply the principles applicable on an application for judicial review. (3) The court— (a) must discontinue the review hearing if the individual requests the court to do so; and (b) may discontinue the review hearing in any other circumstances. (4) The court may not discontinue the review hearing in accordance with subsection (3)(b) without giving the Secretary of State and the individual the opportunity to make representations. (5) The court has the following powers (and only those powers) on a review hearing— (a) power to quash the TPIM notice; (b) power to quash measures specified in the TPIM notice; (c) power to give directions to the Secretary of State for, or in relation to,— (i) the revocation of the TPIM notice, or (ii) the variation of measures specified in the TPIM notice. (6) If the court does not exercise any of its powers under subsection (5), the court must decide that the TPIM notice is to continue in force. (7) If the court exercises a power under subsection (5)(b) or (c)(ii), the court must decide that the TPIM notice is to continue in force subject to that exercise of that power. (8) In this section “relevant conditions” means— (a) condition A; (b) condition B; (c) condition C; and (d) condition D.
9 Review hearing
(1) On a review hearing held in compliance with directions under section 8(4), the function of the court is to review the decisions of the Secretary of State that the relevant conditions were met and continue to be met. (2) In doing so, the court must apply the principles applicable on an application for judicial review. (3) The court— (a) must discontinue the review hearing if the individual requests the court to do so; and (b) may discontinue the review hearing in any other circumstances. (4) The court may not discontinue the review hearing in accordance with subsection (3)(b) without giving the Secretary of State and the individual the opportunity to make representations. (5) The court has the following powers (and only those powers) on a review hearing— (a) power to quash the TPIM notice; (b) power to quash measures specified in the TPIM notice; (c) power to give directions to the Secretary of State for, or in relation to,— (i) the revocation of the TPIM notice, or (ii) the variation of measures specified in the TPIM notice. (6) If the court does not exercise any of its powers under subsection (5), the court must decide that the TPIM notice is to continue in force. (7) If the court exercises a power under subsection (5)(b) or (c)(ii), the court must decide that the TPIM notice is to continue in force subject to that exercise of that power. (8) In this section “relevant conditions” means— (a) condition A; (b) condition B; (c) condition C; and (d) condition D.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.