Propose a change

The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Search, Recovery of Cryptoassets and Investigations: Codes of Practice) Regulations 2024

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

Title and introductory text

2024 No. 551 PROCEEDS OF CRIME The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Search, Recovery of Cryptoassets and Investigations: Codes of Practice) Regulations 2024 Made 22nd April 2024 Coming into force 26th April 2024 The Secretary of State makes these Regulations in exercise of the powers conferred by section 47S(4) and (5), section 303G(5) (as applied by section 303Z25(1)) and section 377(4) and (8) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (“the 2002 Act”). A draft of this instrument has been laid before Parliament under section 459(6) and (6ZB) of the 2002 Act and has been approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament. The Secretary of State has— under section 47S(5) of the 2002 Act, revised the code of practice issued under section 47S(1) of the 2002 Act and, in accordance with section 47S(2)(a), (b) and (c), (2A) and (3), published a draft of the revised code of practice, considered any representations made about the draft, modified the draft as the Secretary of State thought appropriate in the light of any such representations, consulted the Attorney General about the draft in its application to the exercise of powers by Serious Fraud Office (“SFO”) officers and the Director of the SFO and laid the draft before Parliament; under section 303G of the 2002 Act, as applied by section 303Z25, made a code of practice and, in accordance with section 303G(2)(a), (b) and (c), (3) and (4) as so applied, published a draft of the code of practice, considered any representations made about the draft by the Scottish Ministers, the Department of Justice or any other person, modified the draft as the Secretary of State thought appropriate in the light of any such representations, consulted the Attorney General about the draft in its application to the exercise of powers by SFO officers and the Director of the SFO and laid the draft before Parliament; under section 377(8) of the 2002 Act, revised the code of practice issued under section 377(1) of the 2002 Act and, in accordance with section 377(2)(a), (b) and (c), (2A) and (3), published a draft of the revised code of practice, considered any representations made about the draft, modified the draft as the Secretary of State thought appropriate in the light of any such representations, consulted the Treasury about the draft in its application to functions that Financial Conduct Authority officers have under Chapter 2 of Part 8 of the 2002 Act and laid the revised code of practice before Parliament.

Your change, as a redline

Title and introductory text

2024 No. 551 PROCEEDS OF CRIME The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Search, Recovery of Cryptoassets and Investigations: Codes of Practice) Regulations 2024 Made 22nd April 2024 Coming into force 26th April 2024 The Secretary of State makes these Regulations in exercise of the powers conferred by section 47S(4) and (5), section 303G(5) (as applied by section 303Z25(1)) and section 377(4) and (8) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (“the 2002 Act”). A draft of this instrument has been laid before Parliament under section 459(6) and (6ZB) of the 2002 Act and has been approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament. The Secretary of State has— under section 47S(5) of the 2002 Act, revised the code of practice issued under section 47S(1) of the 2002 Act and, in accordance with section 47S(2)(a), (b) and (c), (2A) and (3), published a draft of the revised code of practice, considered any representations made about the draft, modified the draft as the Secretary of State thought appropriate in the light of any such representations, consulted the Attorney General about the draft in its application to the exercise of powers by Serious Fraud Office (“SFO”) officers and the Director of the SFO and laid the draft before Parliament; under section 303G of the 2002 Act, as applied by section 303Z25, made a code of practice and, in accordance with section 303G(2)(a), (b) and (c), (3) and (4) as so applied, published a draft of the code of practice, considered any representations made about the draft by the Scottish Ministers, the Department of Justice or any other person, modified the draft as the Secretary of State thought appropriate in the light of any such representations, consulted the Attorney General about the draft in its application to the exercise of powers by SFO officers and the Director of the SFO and laid the draft before Parliament; under section 377(8) of the 2002 Act, revised the code of practice issued under section 377(1) of the 2002 Act and, in accordance with section 377(2)(a), (b) and (c), (2A) and (3), published a draft of the revised code of practice, considered any representations made about the draft, modified the draft as the Secretary of State thought appropriate in the light of any such representations, consulted the Treasury about the draft in its application to functions that Financial Conduct Authority officers have under Chapter 2 of Part 8 of the 2002 Act and laid the revised code of practice before Parliament.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds