Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
64 Commission for Equality and Human Rights
(1) In the Equality Act 2006 omit— (a) sections 10(1) and (4) to (8) and 19 (groups); (b) section 27 (conciliation). (2) In section 12(4)(b) of that Act (monitoring progress: reports every three years) for “three” substitute “ five ”. (3) The following subsections make further amendments to the Equality Act 2006. (4) In section 7(3) (Scotland: human rights) omit “or 10”. (5) In section 9(4) and (5) (human rights) omit “or 10”. (6) In section 12 (monitoring progress)— (a) in subsection (1)(a) for “the aim specified in section 3” substitute “ the duties specified in sections 8 and 9 ”; (b) in subsection (1)(b) for “the development of the society described in section 3” substitute “ changes in society that are consistent with those duties ”. (7) In section 13(1) (information, advice etc) for “to 10” substitute “ and 9 ”. (8) In section 16(1) (inquiries) for “, 9 and 10” substitute “ and 9 ”. (9) In section 17(1) (grants) for “to 10” substitute “ and 9 ”. (10) In section 39(4) (orders and regulations) for “10(6), 15(6) or 27(10)” substitute “ 15(6) ”. (11) In Schedule 1 (the Commission)— (a) in paragraph 39 omit “or 27”; (b) omit paragraph 52(1)(a)(v) and (vi) and (b); (c) for paragraph 52(3)(b) substitute— (b) section 8, in so far as it relates to disability, and ; (d) in paragraph 52(3)(c) omit “, 27(2) and (3)”. (12) The following subsections amend the Equality Act 2010 in consequence of subsection (1). (13) In section 118 (time limits)— (a) in subsection (2) omit “or (4)”; (b) omit subsection (4). (14) In Schedule 17 (disabled pupils: enforcement) omit— (a) paragraph 4(2) (time limits where dispute referred to conciliation under section 27 of the Equality Act 2006); (b) in paragraph 4(2A), “or for conciliation in pursuance of arrangements under section 27 of the Equality Act 2006”.
64 Commission for Equality and Human Rights
(1) In the Equality Act 2006 omit— (a) sections 10(1) and (4) to (8) and 19 (groups); (b) section 27 (conciliation). (2) In section 12(4)(b) of that Act (monitoring progress: reports every three years) for “three” substitute “ five ”. (3) The following subsections make further amendments to the Equality Act 2006. (4) In section 7(3) (Scotland: human rights) omit “or 10”. (5) In section 9(4) and (5) (human rights) omit “or 10”. (6) In section 12 (monitoring progress)— (a) in subsection (1)(a) for “the aim specified in section 3” substitute “ the duties specified in sections 8 and 9 ”; (b) in subsection (1)(b) for “the development of the society described in section 3” substitute “ changes in society that are consistent with those duties ”. (7) In section 13(1) (information, advice etc) for “to 10” substitute “ and 9 ”. (8) In section 16(1) (inquiries) for “, 9 and 10” substitute “ and 9 ”. (9) In section 17(1) (grants) for “to 10” substitute “ and 9 ”. (10) In section 39(4) (orders and regulations) for “10(6), 15(6) or 27(10)” substitute “ 15(6) ”. (11) In Schedule 1 (the Commission)— (a) in paragraph 39 omit “or 27”; (b) omit paragraph 52(1)(a)(v) and (vi) and (b); (c) for paragraph 52(3)(b) substitute— (b) section 8, in so far as it relates to disability, and ; (d) in paragraph 52(3)(c) omit “, 27(2) and (3)”. (12) The following subsections amend the Equality Act 2010 in consequence of subsection (1). (13) In section 118 (time limits)— (a) in subsection (2) omit “or (4)”; (b) omit subsection (4). (14) In Schedule 17 (disabled pupils: enforcement) omit— (a) paragraph 4(2) (time limits where dispute referred to conciliation under section 27 of the Equality Act 2006); (b) in paragraph 4(2A), “or for conciliation in pursuance of arrangements under section 27 of the Equality Act 2006”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.