The Extradition Act 2003 (Amendment to Designations) Order 2025
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
2 Amendment of Extradition Act 2003 (Designation of Part 2 Territories) Order 2003
(1) The Extradition Act 2003 (Designation of Part 2 Territories) Order 2003 is amended as follows. (2) In article 2(2)— (a) omit “Hong Kong Special Administrative Region,”; (b) after “Zambia” omit “, Zimbabwe . (3) In article 3(2), after “Canada,” insert “Chile,”. (4) Omit article 3(3). (5) In article 4(2)— (a) omit “Chile (65 days)”; (b) omit “Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (65 days)”.
2 Amendment of Extradition Act 2003 (Designation of Part 2 Territories) Order 2003
(1) The Extradition Act 2003 (Designation of Part 2 Territories) Order 2003 is amended as follows. (2) In article 2(2)— (a) omit “Hong Kong Special Administrative Region,”; (b) after “Zambia” omit “, Zimbabwe . (3) In article 3(2), after “Canada,” insert “Chile,”. (4) Omit article 3(3). (5) In article 4(2)— (a) omit “Chile (65 days)”; (b) omit “Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (65 days)”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.