Propose a change

National Health Service Act 2006

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

223K Payments in respect of quality

(1) NHS England may, after the end of a financial year, make a payment to an integrated care board. (2) For the purpose of determining whether to make a payment under subsection (1) and (if so) the amount of the payment, NHS England must take into account at least one of the following factors— (a) the quality of relevant services provided during the financial year; (b) any improvement in the quality of relevant services provided during that year (in comparison to the quality of relevant services provided during previous financial years); (c) the outcomes identified during the financial year as having been achieved from the provision at any time of relevant services; (d) any improvement in the outcomes identified during that financial year as having been so achieved (in comparison to the outcomes identified during previous financial years as having been so achieved). (3) For that purpose, NHS England may also take into account either or both of the following factors— (a) relevant inequalities identified during that year; (b) any reduction in relevant inequalities identified during that year (in comparison to relevant inequalities identified during previous financial years). (4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (6) Regulations may make provision as to how payments under subsection (1) may be spent .... (7) An integrated care board must publish an explanation of how the board has spent any payment made to it under subsection (1). (8) In this section— “relevant services” means services provided in pursuance of arrangements made by the integrated care board in the exercise of its functions by virtue of this Act; “relevant inequalities” means inequalities between the persons for whose benefit relevant services are at any time provided with respect to— their ability to access the services, or the outcomes achieved for them by their provision.

Your change, as a redline

223K Payments in respect of quality

(1) NHS England may, after the end of a financial year, make a payment to an integrated care board. (2) For the purpose of determining whether to make a payment under subsection (1) and (if so) the amount of the payment, NHS England must take into account at least one of the following factors— (a) the quality of relevant services provided during the financial year; (b) any improvement in the quality of relevant services provided during that year (in comparison to the quality of relevant services provided during previous financial years); (c) the outcomes identified during the financial year as having been achieved from the provision at any time of relevant services; (d) any improvement in the outcomes identified during that financial year as having been so achieved (in comparison to the outcomes identified during previous financial years as having been so achieved). (3) For that purpose, NHS England may also take into account either or both of the following factors— (a) relevant inequalities identified during that year; (b) any reduction in relevant inequalities identified during that year (in comparison to relevant inequalities identified during previous financial years). (4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (6) Regulations may make provision as to how payments under subsection (1) may be spent .... (7) An integrated care board must publish an explanation of how the board has spent any payment made to it under subsection (1). (8) In this section— “relevant services” means services provided in pursuance of arrangements made by the integrated care board in the exercise of its functions by virtue of this Act; “relevant inequalities” means inequalities between the persons for whose benefit relevant services are at any time provided with respect to— their ability to access the services, or the outcomes achieved for them by their provision.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds