Asylum and Immigration (Treatment of Claimants, etc. ) Act 2004
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
15 Fingerprinting
(1) Section 141 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 (c. 33) (fingerprinting) shall be amended as follows. (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4) In subsection (9) for paragraph (c) substitute— (c) for C— (i) the time when the relevant immigration decision ceases to have effect, whether as a result of an appeal or otherwise, or (ii) if a deportation order has been made against him, its revocation or its otherwise ceasing to have effect; . (5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
15 Fingerprinting
(1) Section 141 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 (c. 33) (fingerprinting) shall be amended as follows. (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4) In subsection (9) for paragraph (c) substitute— (c) for C— (i) the time when the relevant immigration decision ceases to have effect, whether as a result of an appeal or otherwise, or (ii) if a deportation order has been made against him, its revocation or its otherwise ceasing to have effect; . (5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.