Propose a change

Capital Allowances Act 2001

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

104E Disposal value of special rate assets

(1) This section applies if— (a) section 104D (writing-down allowances at 6% or 10%) has had effect in relation to any special rate expenditure incurred by a person (“the taxpayer”), (b) any disposal event occurs in relation to the item on which the expenditure was incurred, (c) the disposal value to be brought into account by the taxpayer would (but for this section) be less than the notional written-down value of the item, and (d) the disposal event is part of, or occurs as a result of, a scheme or arrangement the main purpose or one of the main purposes of which is the obtaining by the taxpayer of a tax advantage under this Part. (2) The disposal value that the taxpayer must bring into account is the notional written-down value of the item. (3) The notional written-down value is— QE-A where— QE is the taxpayer's expenditure on the item that is qualifying expenditure, and A is the total of all allowances which could have been made to the taxpayer in respect of that expenditure if— that expenditure had been the only expenditure that had ever been taken into account in determining the taxpayer's available qualifying expenditure, where the item is a long-life asset, that expenditure had not been prevented by the application of a monetary limit from being long-life asset expenditure, and all allowances had been made in full.

Your change, as a redline

104E Disposal value of special rate assets

(1) This section applies if— (a) section 104D (writing-down allowances at 6% or 10%) has had effect in relation to any special rate expenditure incurred by a person (“the taxpayer”), (b) any disposal event occurs in relation to the item on which the expenditure was incurred, (c) the disposal value to be brought into account by the taxpayer would (but for this section) be less than the notional written-down value of the item, and (d) the disposal event is part of, or occurs as a result of, a scheme or arrangement the main purpose or one of the main purposes of which is the obtaining by the taxpayer of a tax advantage under this Part. (2) The disposal value that the taxpayer must bring into account is the notional written-down value of the item. (3) The notional written-down value is— QE-A where— QE is the taxpayer's expenditure on the item that is qualifying expenditure, and A is the total of all allowances which could have been made to the taxpayer in respect of that expenditure if— that expenditure had been the only expenditure that had ever been taken into account in determining the taxpayer's available qualifying expenditure, where the item is a long-life asset, that expenditure had not been prevented by the application of a monetary limit from being long-life asset expenditure, and all allowances had been made in full.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds