Propose a change

Capital Allowances Act 2001

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

212G Qualifying 75% subsidiaries

(1) For the purposes of sections 212E and 212F a company (“the subsidiary company”) is a qualifying 75% subsidiary of another company (“the parent company”) if condition 1 or 2 is met and condition 3 is met. (2) Condition 1 is that— (a) the subsidiary company has ordinary share capital, and (b) the subsidiary company is a 75% subsidiary of the parent company (see section 1154(3) of CTA 2010). (3) Condition 2 is that— (a) the subsidiary company does not have ordinary share capital, and (b) the parent company has control of the subsidiary company. (4) Condition 3 is that the parent company— (a) is beneficially entitled to at least 75% of any profits available for distribution to equity holders of the subsidiary company, and (b) would be beneficially entitled to at least 75% of any assets of the subsidiary company available for distribution to its equity holders on a winding-up. (5) Chapter 6 of Part 5 of CTA 2010 (equity holders and profits or assets available for distribution) applies for the purposes of subsection (4) as that Chapter applies for the purposes of section 151(4)(a) and (b) of that Act (meaning of “75% subsidiary”). (6) But in a case where the subsidiary company does not have ordinary share capital, Chapter 6 of Part 5 of that Act applies for those purposes as if the members of that company were equity holders of that company for the purposes of that Chapter.

Your change, as a redline

212G Qualifying 75% subsidiaries

(1) For the purposes of sections 212E and 212F a company (“the subsidiary company”) is a qualifying 75% subsidiary of another company (“the parent company”) if condition 1 or 2 is met and condition 3 is met. (2) Condition 1 is that— (a) the subsidiary company has ordinary share capital, and (b) the subsidiary company is a 75% subsidiary of the parent company (see section 1154(3) of CTA 2010). (3) Condition 2 is that— (a) the subsidiary company does not have ordinary share capital, and (b) the parent company has control of the subsidiary company. (4) Condition 3 is that the parent company— (a) is beneficially entitled to at least 75% of any profits available for distribution to equity holders of the subsidiary company, and (b) would be beneficially entitled to at least 75% of any assets of the subsidiary company available for distribution to its equity holders on a winding-up. (5) Chapter 6 of Part 5 of CTA 2010 (equity holders and profits or assets available for distribution) applies for the purposes of subsection (4) as that Chapter applies for the purposes of section 151(4)(a) and (b) of that Act (meaning of “75% subsidiary”). (6) But in a case where the subsidiary company does not have ordinary share capital, Chapter 6 of Part 5 of that Act applies for those purposes as if the members of that company were equity holders of that company for the purposes of that Chapter.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds