Propose a change

Capital Allowances Act 2001

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

218ZA Restrictions on writing-down allowances: section 215

(1) If this subsection applies as a result of section 215, all or part of B's expenditure under the relevant transaction is to be left out of account in determining B's available qualifying expenditure. (2) The amount of expenditure to be left out of account is— (a) such amount as would or would in effect cancel out the tax advantage mentioned in section 215 (whether that advantage is obtained by B or another person and whether it relates to the relevant transaction or something else), or (b) if the amount found under paragraph (a) exceeds the whole of B's expenditure under the relevant transaction, the whole of that expenditure. (3) But if subsection (1) applies as a result of section 215 and— (a) section 218 also applies as a result of section 214 or 216, or (b) section 228 also applies by virtue of an election under section 70I(11) or 227, the amount of expenditure to be left out of account is the greater of X and Y. (4) For the purposes of subsection (3)— “X” is the amount found under subsection (2), and “Y” is the amount by which B's expenditure under the relevant transaction exceeds D (as defined in section 218 or, as the case may be, section 228). (5) If this subsection applies as a result of section 215— (a) the allowance mentioned in subsection (7)(a) of that section is to be calculated using the rate that would be used without the tax advantage, or (as the case may be) (b) the entitlement mentioned in subsection (7)(b) of that section is to be available as and when it would be available without the tax advantage. (6) Subsection (5) applies whether or not section 218 also applies as a result of section 214 or 216, or section 228 also applies by virtue of an election under section 70I(11) or 227.

Your change, as a redline

218ZA Restrictions on writing-down allowances: section 215

(1) If this subsection applies as a result of section 215, all or part of B's expenditure under the relevant transaction is to be left out of account in determining B's available qualifying expenditure. (2) The amount of expenditure to be left out of account is— (a) such amount as would or would in effect cancel out the tax advantage mentioned in section 215 (whether that advantage is obtained by B or another person and whether it relates to the relevant transaction or something else), or (b) if the amount found under paragraph (a) exceeds the whole of B's expenditure under the relevant transaction, the whole of that expenditure. (3) But if subsection (1) applies as a result of section 215 and— (a) section 218 also applies as a result of section 214 or 216, or (b) section 228 also applies by virtue of an election under section 70I(11) or 227, the amount of expenditure to be left out of account is the greater of X and Y. (4) For the purposes of subsection (3)— “X” is the amount found under subsection (2), and “Y” is the amount by which B's expenditure under the relevant transaction exceeds D (as defined in section 218 or, as the case may be, section 228). (5) If this subsection applies as a result of section 215— (a) the allowance mentioned in subsection (7)(a) of that section is to be calculated using the rate that would be used without the tax advantage, or (as the case may be) (b) the entitlement mentioned in subsection (7)(b) of that section is to be available as and when it would be available without the tax advantage. (6) Subsection (5) applies whether or not section 218 also applies as a result of section 214 or 216, or section 228 also applies by virtue of an election under section 70I(11) or 227.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds